Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec;29(1):1881207.
doi: 10.1080/26410397.2021.1881207.

Research priorities to support evidence-informed policies and advocacy for access to safe abortion care in sub-Saharan Africa

Affiliations

Research priorities to support evidence-informed policies and advocacy for access to safe abortion care in sub-Saharan Africa

Anthony Idowu Ajayi et al. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

A key obstacle to advocacy efforts to promote legal and policy reforms that ensure women's and girls' access to comprehensive abortion care (CAC) is the lack of relevant and timely evidence. This commentary outlines a research agenda-setting initiative that identified research priorities to support evidence-informed policy and advocacy for CAC access in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). It involved three phases: 1) a landscape analysis; 2) research agenda co-creation with stakeholders, and 3) a validation exercise on research priorities. Overall, the priority evidence needs included 1) estimating the incidence and magnitude of unsafe abortion and related costs; 2) examining the role of abortion laws and policies in facilitating or inhibiting access to CAC; 3) developing and documenting successful approaches for addressing societal barriers to the provision of CAC, and fostering a more inclusive and liberal abortion environment, and 4) documenting practice-based evidence on the provision of legal abortion services as well as for advocating for CAC. Various stakeholders, including researchers, policymakers, civil society organizations, and funding agencies, will find the agenda useful as they engage, at different levels, for the full domestication and implementation of forward-looking commitments on access to CAC in SSA.

Keywords: Maputo Protocol; abortion research priorities; advocacy and policy engagement; comprehensive abortion care; post-abortion care; safe abortion; sub-Saharan Africa.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Singh S, Maddow-Zimet I.. Facility-based treatment for medical complications resulting from unsafe pregnancy termination in the developing world, 2012: a review of evidence from 26 countries. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;123(9):1489–1498. - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization . Unsafe abortion incidence and mortality: global and regional levels in 2008 and trends during 1990-2008. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2012.
    1. Johnson BR, Lavelanet AF, Schlitt S.. Global abortion policies database: a new approach to strengthening knowledge on laws, policies, and human rights standards. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2018;18(1):1–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sedgh G, Singh S, Hussain R.. Intended and unintended pregnancies worldwide in 2012 and recent trends. Stud Fam Plann. 2014;45(3):301–314. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sedgh G, Singh S, Shah IH, et al. . Induced abortion: incidence and trends worldwide from 1995 to 2008. Lancet. 2012;379(9816):625–632. - PubMed