Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul 1;91(4):496-501.
doi: 10.2319/062320-576.1.

Is the adolescent's esthetic concern associated with anterior occlusal conditions or the malocclusion severity level?

Is the adolescent's esthetic concern associated with anterior occlusal conditions or the malocclusion severity level?

Kaarlye C P Andrade de Melo et al. Angle Orthod. .

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the esthetic impact of anterior occlusal conditions and malocclusion severity levels.

Materials and methods: A population-based cross-sectional study of 700 adolescents aged 15 to 19 years was conducted. The Oral Aesthetic Subjective Impact Scale (OASIS) was used to evaluate the subjective esthetic impact of malocclusion. The Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) criteria were used to diagnose the anterior occlusal characteristics in isolation and the severity levels of malocclusion. The variables with P < .20 in the individual analyses were tested in multiple logistic regression models, and those with P < .10 remained in the model. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) was estimated with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results: Of the adolescents, 42% showed negative self-perception of malocclusion. In addition, 15.4% of adolescents had severe malocclusion (DAI 3) and 18.9% very severe malocclusion (DAI 4). Crowding and spacing were shown to be 2.90 (CI: 2.06-4.09) and 2.53 (CI: 1.65-3.86) times, respectively, more likely to cause a negative esthetic impact in adolescents (P < .05). In addition, adolescents with orthodontic treatment need (DAI 2, 3, and 4) were more likely to report a negative esthetic impact (P < .05).

Conclusions: Anterior crowding and spacing are the conditions that most influence the esthetic concern of adolescents. Adolescents with very severe malocclusion and higher orthodontic treatment need are more likely to report a negative esthetic impact.

Keywords: Adolescents; Malocclusion; Self-perception.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Distribution of the Subjective Aesthetic Orthodontic Impact (OASIS) score of the sample.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Salih FN, Lindsten R, Bagesung M. Perception of orthodontic treatment need among Swedish children, adolescents and young adults. Acta Odontol Scand. 2017;75:407–412. - PubMed
    1. de Oliveira Meira ACL, Custodio W, Vedovello Filho M, et al. How is orthodontic treatment need associated with perceived esthetic impact of malocclusion in adolescents? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020;158:668–673. - PubMed
    1. Kaieda AK, Bulgareli JV, Cunha IP, et al. Malocclusion and dental appearance in underprivileged Brazilian adolescents. Braz Oral Res. 2019;33:e014. - PubMed
    1. Ashari A, Mohamed AM. Relationship of the Dental Aesthetic Index to the oral health-related quality of life. Angle Orthod. 2016;86:337–342. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Taghavi Bayat J, Huggare J, Akrami N. Distinguishing between global and dental self-esteem in evaluating malocclusions. Acta Odontol Scand. 2019;77:452–456. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources