Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Aug;142(8):1775-1791.
doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03811-5. Epub 2021 Feb 15.

Safety and efficacy of outpatient hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Safety and efficacy of outpatient hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Y F L Bemelmans et al. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

Introduction: This systematic review aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of outpatient joint arthroplasty (OJA) pathways compared to inpatient pathways.

Materials and methods: An electronic literature search was conducted to identify eligible studies. Studies comparing OJA with inpatient pathways-following hip and/or (partial) knee arthroplasty-were included. Included studies were assigned-based on OJA definition-to one of the following two groups: (1) outpatient surgery (OS); outpatient defined as discharge on the same day as surgery; and (2) semi-outpatient surgery (SOS); outpatient defined as discharge within 24 h after surgery with or without an overnight stay. Methodological quality was assessed. Outcomes included (serious) adverse events ((S)AEs), readmissions, successful same-day discharge rates, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and costs. Meta-analyses and subgroup analyses by type of arthroplasty were performed when deemed appropriate.

Results: A total of 41 studies (OS = 26, SOS = 15) met the inclusion criteria. One RCT and 40 observational studies were included, with an overall risk-of-bias of moderate to high. Forty studies were included in the meta-analysis. Outpatients (both OS and SOS) were younger and had a lower BMI and ASA class compared to inpatients. Overall, no significant differences between outpatients and inpatients were found for overall complications and readmission rates, and improvement in PROMs. By type of arthroplasty, only THAs in OS pathways were associated with fewer AEs [OR = 0.55 (0.41-0.74)] compared to inpatient pathways. 92% of OS patients were discharged on the day of surgery. OJA resulted in an average cost reduction of $6.797,02.

Conclusion: OJA pathways are as safe and effective as inpatient pathways in selected populations, with a potential reduction of costs. Considerable risk of bias in the majority of studies emphasizes the need for further research.

Keywords: Clinical pathway; Hip arthroplasty; Knee arthroplasty; Outpatient joint arthroplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Bailey CR, Ahuja M, Bartholomew K et al (2019) Guidelines for day-case surgery 2019: Guidelines from the association of anaesthetists and the british association of day surgery. Anaesthesia 74(6):778–792 - PubMed - DOI
    1. Bovonratwet P, Ondeck NT, Tyagi V et al (2017) Outpatient and inpatient unicompartmental knee arthroplasty procedures have similar short-term complication profiles. J Arthroplasty 32(10):2935–2940 - PubMed - DOI
    1. Bovonratwet P, Ondeck NT, Nelson SJ et al (2017) Comparison of outpatient vs inpatient total knee arthroplasty: an ACS-NSQIP analysis. J Arthroplasty 32(6):1773–1778 - PubMed - DOI
    1. Bovonratwet P, Webb ML, Ondeck NT et al (2017) Definitional differences of “outpatient” versus “inpatient” THA and TKA can affect study outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 475(12):2917–2925 - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Bertin KC (2005) Minimally invasive outpatient total hip arthroplasty: a financial analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 435:154–163 - DOI

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources