Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul;135(4):1417-1424.
doi: 10.1007/s00414-021-02531-0. Epub 2021 Feb 15.

Large fragment demineralization: an alternative pretreatment for forensic DNA typing of bones

Affiliations

Large fragment demineralization: an alternative pretreatment for forensic DNA typing of bones

Heitor Corrêa et al. Int J Legal Med. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

In forensic genetics, the analysis of postmortem bones is one of the most challenging due to the low quantity of degraded endogenous DNA. The most widely used approach for sample preparation, in those cases, is pulverizing the bone. However, processing pulverized bone is extremely delicate, requiring strict laboratory conditions and operating procedures. In fact, several recent publications have focused on non-powder approaches. The objectives of this study were, thus, to validate a non-powder protocol for DNA extraction from forensic bones and an alternative pretreatment, large fragment demineralization (LFD). Thirty human femurs and tibiae received by the Legal Medicine Institute of Brescia, Italy, were included in the study. Bone powder and one transversal section of the diaphysis were sampled from each bone. DNA extraction from the powder was carried out using PrepFiler BTA (BTA), while the transversal section was submitted to the alternative demineralizing pretreatment (LFD) followed by DNA extraction using the QIAamp DNA Investigator. DNA extracts were assessed for human DNA quantity and degradation by means of a validated in-house qPCR assay and amplified with commercial kits. Inhibition assessment was carried out through Quality Sensor analysis using 24plex QS Kit. The differences in quantity, quality of human DNA, and number of alleles detected between both methods were comparable and not statistically significant. We propose the use of the LFD protocol as a complementary approach capable of confirming the genotypes or detect alleles not observed using BTA, without the need for pulverization.

Keywords: Bone; DNA typing; Forensic genetics; Human identification; Short tandem repeat.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hochmeister MN, Budowle B, Borer UV, Eggmann U, Comey CT, Dirnhofer R (1991) Typing of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) extracted from compact bone from human remains. J Forensic Sci. 36:1649–1661 - PubMed
    1. Parsons TJ, Huel RML, Bajunović Z, Rizvić A (2019) Large Scale DNA identification: the ICMP experience. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 38:236–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.11.008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Loreille OM, Diegoli TM, Irwin JA, Coble MD, Parsons TJ (2007) High efficiency DNA extraction from bone by total demineralization. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 1:191–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2007.02.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zeng X, Elwick K, Mayes C, Takahashi M, King JL, Gangitano D, Budowle B, Hughes-Stamm S (2019) Assessment of impact of DNA extraction methods on analysis of human remain samples on massively parallel sequencing success. Int J Legal Med. 133:51–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-018-1955-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pajnič IZ (2016) Extraction of DNA from human skeletal material. Methods Mol Biol. 1420:89–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3597-0_7 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources