Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 1;147(3):728-740.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007675.

Free Flap Reconstruction of Posterior Trunk Soft-Tissue Defects: Single-Institution Experience and Systematic Literature Review

Affiliations

Free Flap Reconstruction of Posterior Trunk Soft-Tissue Defects: Single-Institution Experience and Systematic Literature Review

Zeynep Akdeniz-Dogan et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. .

Abstract

Background: The posterior trunk is a technically demanding location for microvascular free tissue transfer. In this study, the authors report their own institutional experience with soft-tissue free flap reconstruction of the posterior trunk and provide a systematic review of the literature regarding this uncommon clinical scenario.

Methods: A systematic review was performed using the PubMed database in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A single-institution retrospective review was also performed including all patients who received a soft-tissue free flap for a posterior trunk defect between 1990 and 2019.

Results: The database search yielded 15 articles, representing 61 patients; the most commonly used flap was the latissimus dorsi (45.9 percent) and the most commonly reported defect location was the lumbosacrum (42.3 percent). Retrospective review of the authors' database identified 26 patients, with the latissimus dorsi being the most common flap and the sacrum the most common defect site. The authors' institutional case series showed a 30.7 percent major complication rate and 7.7 percent total flap loss rate; 38.4 percent of flaps required vein grafting.

Conclusions: In this study, the authors provided a systematic literature review and described their own long-term institutional experience with these rare and difficult reconstructions. Although the overall complication rate is high, these reconstructions are frequently necessary, and an algorithmic approach can improve outcomes.

Clinical question/level of evidence: Therapeutic, IV.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Hallock GG. Reconstruction of posterior trunk defects. Semin Plast Surg. 2011;25:78–85.
    1. Mathes DW, Thornton JF, Rohrich RJ. Management of posterior trunk defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:73e–83e.
    1. Behr B, Wagner JM, Wallner C, Harati K, Lehnhardt M, Daigeler A. Reconstructive options for oncologic posterior trunk defects: A review. Front Oncol. 2016;6:51.
    1. Brunetti B, Tenna S, Aveta A, et al. Posterior trunk reconstruction with the dorsal intercostal artery perforator based flap: Clinical experience on 20 consecutive oncological cases. Microsurgery 2016;36:546–551.
    1. Prasad V, Morris SF. Propeller DICAP flap for a large defect on the back: Case report and review of the literature. Microsurgery 2012;32:617–621.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources