Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 15;21(1):139.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03629-4.

Prenatal care experiences among pregnant women with obesity in Wisconsin, United States: a qualitative quality improvement assessment

Danielle J Hurst  1 , Nicholas B Schmuhl  2 , Corrine I Voils  3   4 , Kathleen M Antony  5   6
Affiliations

Prenatal care experiences among pregnant women with obesity in Wisconsin, United States: a qualitative quality improvement assessment

Danielle J Hurst et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: Stigma and bias experienced during prenatal care can affect quality of care and, ultimately, the health of pregnant women with obesity and their infants. We sought to 1) better understand the bias and stigma that women with BMIs ≥40 kg/m2 experience while receiving prenatal care, 2) gauge women's interest in group prenatal education for women with obesity, and 3) gather feedback about their preferred weight-related terminology.

Methods: We conducted and thematically content-analyzed 30 semi-structured interviews of women with BMIs ≥40 kg/m2 who received prenatal care at a university-affiliated teaching hospital in the Midwest region of the United States.

Results: All women recalled positive experiences during their perinatal care during which they felt listened to and respected by providers. However, many also described a fear of weight-related bias or recalled weight-based discrimination. Women reacted favorably to a proposed group prenatal care option for pregnant women with obesity that focused on nutrition, physical activity, and weight management. Women rated "weight" and "BMI" as the most desirable terms for describing weight, while "large size" and "obesity" were rated least desirable.

Conclusions: Many pregnant women with BMIs ≥40 kg/m2 experience bias in the prenatal care setting. Potential steps to mitigate bias towards weight include improving provider awareness of the experiences and perspectives of this population, expanding prenatal care options targeted towards women with high BMIs, including group care, and using patient-preferred weight-related terminology. Through the remainder of this manuscript, wherever possible, the term "high BMI" will be used in place of the term "obesity" to describe women with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 in order to respect the preferred terminology of the women we interviewed.

Keywords: Obesity; Pregnancy; Prenatal care; Provider weight bias; Weight-bias.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
COREQ diagram. This is the flowchart in the COREQ (COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative research) style for screening, enrollment, and interview completion
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Pregnant women’s rated desirability of weight-related terms (scores range from (−2 (very undesirable) to + 2 (very desirable). BMI, body mass index
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Gregor L, Remington PL, Lindberg S, Ehrenthal D. Prevalence of Pre-pregnancy Obesity , 2011–2014. WMJ. 2016;(November): 228–232. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ratnasiri AWG, Lee HC, Lakshminrusimha S, Parry SS, Arief VN, DeLacy IH, et al. Trends in maternal prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) and its association with birth and maternal outcomes in California, 2007-2016: a retrospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2019;14(9):e0222458. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222458. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. El-Chaar D, Finkelstein SA, Tu X, Fell DB, Gaudet L, Sylvain J, et al. The impact of increasing obesity class on obstetrical outcomes. J Obstet Gynaecol Canada. 2013;35(3):224–233. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30994-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gaudet L, Tu X, Fell D, El-Chaar D, Wu Wen S, Walker M. The effect of maternal class III obesity on neonatal outcomes: a retrospective matched cohort study. J Matern Neonatal Med. 2012;25(11):2281–2286. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2012.688080. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Meghelli L, Vambergue A, Drumez E, Deruelle P. Complications of pregnancy in morbidly obese patients: what is the impact of gestational diabetes mellitus? J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2020;49(1):101628. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2019.101628. - DOI - PubMed