Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct;31(7):1435-1441.
doi: 10.1007/s00590-021-02895-4. Epub 2021 Feb 16.

Dynamic hip screw fixation of subtrochanteric femoral fractures

Zaki Arshad  1 , Azeem Thahir  2 , Jaikirty Rawal  2 , Peter D Hull  2 , Andrew D Carrothers  2 , Matija Krkovic  2 , Daud T S Chou  2
Affiliations

Dynamic hip screw fixation of subtrochanteric femoral fractures

Zaki Arshad et al. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

Introduction: A subtrochanteric proximal femur fracture occurs in the 5 cm of bone immediately distal to the lesser trochanter. UK national guidelines advise that adults with subtrochanteric fractures should be treated with an intramedullary nail (IMN). This study aims to compare peri-operative outcome measures of patients with subtrochanteric fractures treated with either an IMN or a dynamic hip screw (DHS) construct.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed subtrochanteric fractures presenting at our institution over 4.5 years (October 2014-May 2019), classifying them into two treatment groups; IMN and DHS. These groups were compared on outcome measures including surgical time, blood loss, radiation dose area product (DAP), length of stay, re-operation rate and mortality.

Results: During the time period studied, 86 patients presented with a subtrochanteric fracture of the femur; with 74 patients (86%) receiving an IMN and 12 (14%) receiving a DHS. The comparative outcome measures reaching statistical significance were blood loss and radiation DAP. The DHS group showed a significantly lower mean blood loss of 776 ml compared to 1029 ml in the IMN group. Also, the DHS group showed a significantly lower mean DAP of 150.30 mGy cm2 compared to 288.86 mGy cm2 in the IMN group.

Conclusion: Although UK national guidelines recommend treating all subtrochanteric fractures with an IMN; the outcome measures assessed in our study did not show use of an IMN to be superior to a DHS. The DHS group showed a lower estimated blood loss and a reduced DAP. This, along with the reduced financial cost associated with a DHS, may support the use of DHS over IMN for certain subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. There may not be a single favourable implant for the treatment of subtrochanteric fractures as a whole; instead different subtypes of fracture may be amenable to a number of fixation devices. Choice of implant should be determined locally and based on existing and future clinical and health economic research.

Keywords: Hip fractures; Hip screws; Internal fixation; Intramedullary nails; Subtrochanteric fractures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Parker M, Johansen A. Hip fracture: Clinical Review. Br Med J. 2006 doi: 10.1136/bmj.333.7557.27. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. NICE (2011) Hip Facture: The management of hip fracture in adults.
    1. Office for National Statistics . Overview of the UK Population. Popul: Overv UK; 2019.
    1. Dell RM, Adams AL, Greene DF, et al. Incidence of atypical nontraumatic diaphyseal fractures of the femur. J Bone Miner Res. 2012 doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1719. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Joglekar SB, Lindvall EM, Martirosian A. Contemporary Management of Subtrochanteric Fractures. North Am: Orthop. Clin; 2015. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources