Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar;60(3):162-170.
doi: 10.1080/14992027.2021.1883197. Epub 2021 Feb 16.

Estimating the global costs of hearing loss

Affiliations
Free article

Estimating the global costs of hearing loss

David McDaid et al. Int J Audiol. 2021 Mar.
Free article

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the global costs of hearing loss in 2019.

Design: Prevalence-based costing model.

Study sample: Hearing loss data from the 2019 Global Burden of Disease study. Additional non-hearing related health care costs, educational support, exclusion from the labour force in countries with full employment and societal costs posed by lost quality of life were determined. All costs were reported in 2019 purchasing power parity (PPP) adjusted international dollars.

Results: Total global economic costs of hearing loss exceeded $981 billion. 47% of costs were related to quality of life losses, with 32% due to additional costs of poor health in people with hearing loss. 57% of costs were outside of high-income countries. 6.5% of costs were for children aged 0-14. In scenario analysis a 5% reduction in prevalence of hearing loss would reduce global costs by $49 billion.

Conclusion: This analysis highlights major economic consequences of not taking action to address hearing loss worldwide. Small reductions in prevalence and/or severity of hearing loss could avert substantial economic costs to society. These cost estimates can also be used to help in modelling the cost effectiveness of interventions to prevent/tackle hearing loss and strengthen the case for investment.

Keywords: Hearing loss; economic cost; global burden of disease; global health policy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

  • Cost of disorders of the brain in Europe 2010.
    Gustavsson A, Svensson M, Jacobi F, Allgulander C, Alonso J, Beghi E, Dodel R, Ekman M, Faravelli C, Fratiglioni L, Gannon B, Jones DH, Jennum P, Jordanova A, Jönsson L, Karampampa K, Knapp M, Kobelt G, Kurth T, Lieb R, Linde M, Ljungcrantz C, Maercker A, Melin B, Moscarelli M, Musayev A, Norwood F, Preisig M, Pugliatti M, Rehm J, Salvador-Carulla L, Schlehofer B, Simon R, Steinhausen HC, Stovner LJ, Vallat JM, Van den Bergh P, van Os J, Vos P, Xu W, Wittchen HU, Jönsson B, Olesen J; CDBE2010Study Group. Gustavsson A, et al. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011 Oct;21(10):718-79. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2011.08.008. Epub 2011 Sep 15. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011. PMID: 21924589
  • Global return on investment and cost-effectiveness of WHO's HEAR interventions for hearing loss: a modelling study.
    Tordrup D, Smith R, Kamenov K, Bertram MY, Green N, Chadha S; WHO HEAR group. Tordrup D, et al. Lancet Glob Health. 2022 Jan;10(1):e52-e62. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00447-2. Lancet Glob Health. 2022. PMID: 34919856 Free PMC article.
  • The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.
    Landrigan PJ, Raps H, Cropper M, Bald C, Brunner M, Canonizado EM, Charles D, Chiles TC, Donohue MJ, Enck J, Fenichel P, Fleming LE, Ferrier-Pages C, Fordham R, Gozt A, Griffin C, Hahn ME, Haryanto B, Hixson R, Ianelli H, James BD, Kumar P, Laborde A, Law KL, Martin K, Mu J, Mulders Y, Mustapha A, Niu J, Pahl S, Park Y, Pedrotti ML, Pitt JA, Ruchirawat M, Seewoo BJ, Spring M, Stegeman JJ, Suk W, Symeonides C, Takada H, Thompson RC, Vicini A, Wang Z, Whitman E, Wirth D, Wolff M, Yousuf AK, Dunlop S. Landrigan PJ, et al. Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023. Ann Glob Health. 2023. PMID: 36969097 Free PMC article. Review.
  • The health and economic burden of smoking in 12 Latin American countries and the potential effect of increasing tobacco taxes: an economic modelling study.
    Pichon-Riviere A, Alcaraz A, Palacios A, Rodríguez B, Reynales-Shigematsu LM, Pinto M, Castillo-Riquelme M, Peña Torres E, Osorio DI, Huayanay L, Loza Munarriz C, de Miera-Juárez BS, Gallegos-Rivero V, De La Puente C, Del Pilar Navia-Bueno M, Caporale J, Roberti J, Virgilio SA, Augustovski F, Bardach A. Pichon-Riviere A, et al. Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Oct;8(10):e1282-e1294. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30311-9. Lancet Glob Health. 2020. PMID: 32971051
  • The Economic Impact of Smoking and of Reducing Smoking Prevalence: Review of Evidence.
    Ekpu VU, Brown AK. Ekpu VU, et al. Tob Use Insights. 2015 Jul 14;8:1-35. doi: 10.4137/TUI.S15628. eCollection 2015. Tob Use Insights. 2015. PMID: 26242225 Free PMC article. Review.

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources