Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May;34(3):183-195.
doi: 10.1111/sdi.12956. Epub 2021 Feb 16.

Updates on hemodialysis techniques with a common denominator: The personalization of the dialytic therapy

Affiliations
Review

Updates on hemodialysis techniques with a common denominator: The personalization of the dialytic therapy

Paolo Monardo et al. Semin Dial. 2021 May.

Abstract

Hemodialysis (HD) is a life-saving therapy for patients with end-stage renal disease. In dialyzed patients, the prevalence of multi-morbidity is rising driven by various factors, such as the population aging, the incomplete correction of uremia, and the side effects of the dialysis therapy itself. Each dialyzed patient has their own specific clinical and biochemical problems. It is therefore unthinkable that the same dialysis procedure can be able to meet the needs of every patient on chronic dialysis. We have very sophisticated dialysis machines and different dialysis techniques and procedures beyond conventional HD, such as hemodiafiltration (HDF) with pre- and post-dilution, acetate-free biofiltration (AFB), hemofiltration (HF), and expanded HD. Each of these techniques has its own specific characteristics. To solve some intradialytic clinical issues, such as arterial hypotension and arrhythmias, we have biofeedback systems with automatic regulation of the blood volume, body temperature, arterial pressure, as well as potassium profiling techniques in the dialysis bath. New technical innovations, such as citrate-containing dialysate or heparin-coated membranes, could reduce the risk of bleeding. To better address to patient needs, the strengths and weaknesses of each of these systems must be well-known, in order to have a personalized dialysis prescription for each patient.

Keywords: citrate anticoagulation; dialysis biofeedback systems; expanded hemodialysis; hemodiafiltration; hemodialysis; heparin-grafted membranes.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Collins AJ, Foley RN, Chavers B, et al. US renal data system 2013 annual data report. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014;63:A7.
    1. Eknoyan G, Beck GJ, Cheung AK, et al. Hemodialysis (HEMO) study group. Effect of dialysis dose and membrane flux in maintenance hemodialysis. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:2010-2019.
    1. Locatelli F, Martin-Malo A, Hannedouche T, et al. Membrane permeability outcome (MPO) study group: effect of membrane permeability on survival of hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20:645-654.
    1. Cooper BA, Branley P, Bulfone L, et al. IDEAL study: a randomized, controlled trial of early versus late initiation of dialysis. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:609-619.
    1. Wanner C, Krane V, März W, et al. German diabetes and dialysis study investigators. Atorvastatin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus undergoing hemodialysis. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:238-248.

Substances

LinkOut - more resources