Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2021 May;23(5):954-962.
doi: 10.1111/jch.14214. Epub 2021 Feb 16.

Kidney function and markers of renal damage after renal denervation. Does method of measurement matter? The Reshape CV-Risk Study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Kidney function and markers of renal damage after renal denervation. Does method of measurement matter? The Reshape CV-Risk Study

Marit D Solbu et al. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2021 May.

Abstract

Data suggest that renal denervation (RDN) in treatment-resistant hypertension (TRHT) is safe in terms of renal function. However, most studies report kidney function as creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), which may be biased by non-renal factors. Damage markers other than albuminuria have never been evaluated after RDN. In this non-randomized RDN trial, we studied changes in kidney function, assessed as measured GFR (mGFR) and various GFR estimates, six months and two years after RDN. We also examined changes in albuminuria and a biomarker of tubular dysfunction. Adult non-diabetic patients with TRHT and eGFR ≥45 ml/min/1.73 m2 were recruited from hypertension clinics. Before bilateral RDN, mGFR was measured by iohexol clearance. We estimated eGFR from serum creatinine and cystatin C (eGFRcrea , eGFRcys, and eGFRcreacys ), and albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR) and N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase (NAG)-creatinine ratio (NAG-CR) were measured in spot urines. All measurements were repeated after six and twenty-four months. Twenty patients, mean age 54 (±9) years and baseline mGFR 83 (±20) ml/min/1.73 m2 underwent RDN. After six months, mGFR fell, eGFRcrea remained unchanged, whereas eGFRcys and eGFRcreacys increased. At 2 years' follow-up, eGFRcreacys was significantly lower than at baseline. mGFR was 78 (±28) ml/min/1.73 m2 . Change in ambulatory systolic BP predicted change in eGFRcrea . Urinary NAG-CR, but not ACR, increased during follow-up. Different GFR assessments gave diverging results after RDN. Therefore, care should be taken to method when evaluating kidney function after RDN. Increases in a tubular dysfunction biomarker suggest that kidney damage may occur. Long-term renal follow-up is needed after RDN.

Keywords: glomerular filtration rate; renal denervation; urinary biomarkers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors has no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Mean glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by exact measurement (mGFR) and three different estimates (eGFRcre, eGFRcys, and eGFRcrecys) at baseline, and at six months and two years after renal denervation
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Two urinary biomarkers, albumin‐creatinine ratio (ACR) and N‐acetyl‐β‐D‐glucosaminidase (NAG)‐creatinine ratio (NAG‐CR), at baseline, and at six months and two years after renal denervation. Values are displayed as median and interquartile range, and significant differences (P <.05) indicated by*

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Collaborators GBDRF, Forouzanfar MH, Alexander L, et al. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks in 188 countries, 1990–2013: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study. Lancet. 2015;386:2287‐2323. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K, et al. 2013 esh/esc guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: The task force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (esh) and of the European Society of Cardiology (esc). Eur Heart J. 2013;34:2159‐2219. - PubMed
    1. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, et al. Group ESCSD: 2018 esc/esh guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:3021‐3104. - PubMed
    1. Daugherty SL, Powers JD, Magid DJ, et al. Incidence and prognosis of resistant hypertension in hypertensive patients. Circulation. 2012;125:1635‐1642. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Voora R, Hinderliter AL. Modulation of sympathetic overactivity to treat resistant hypertension. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2018;20:92. - PubMed

Publication types