Panbio™ rapid antigen test for SARS-CoV-2 has acceptable accuracy in symptomatic patients in primary health care
- PMID: 33592253
- PMCID: PMC7881288
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2021.02.014
Panbio™ rapid antigen test for SARS-CoV-2 has acceptable accuracy in symptomatic patients in primary health care
Abstract
Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the Panbio™ Ag-RDT at primary health care (PHC) centers and test sites in symptomatic patients and close contacts, using the Reverse-Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) test as the gold standard.
Methods: The study was conducted in four PHC centers and two test sites in Mallorca, Spain. Consecutive patients older than 18 years, attending the sites for RT-PCR testing were included. Two nasopharyngeal samples were collected, one for RT-PCR and the other was processed on-site using the Panbio™ rapid antigen test kit for SARS-CoV-2. The sensitivity and specificity were calculated using RT-PCR as the reference, and the predictive values using the pretest probability results for each analyzed group.
Findings: A total of 1369 participants were included; mean age 42.5 ± 14.9 years and 54.3% women. The overall prevalence was 10.2%. Most participants (70.6%) presented within 5 days of the onset of symptoms. The overall sensitivity was of 71.4% (95% CI: 63.1%, 78.7%), the specificity of 99.8% (95% CI: 99.4%, 99.9%), the positive predictive value of 98.0% (95% CI: 93.0%, 99.7%) and a negative predictive value of 96.8% (95% CI: 95.7%, 97.7%). The sensitivity was higher in symptomatic patients, in those arriving within 5 days since symptom onset and in those with high viral load.
Interpretation: Ag-RDT had relatively good performance characteristics in suspected symptomatic patients within five days since the onset of symptoms. However, our data do not support the sole use of Panbio™ Ag-RDT in asymptomatic individuals.
Funding: None.
Keywords: COVID-19; Primary care; Rapid antigen test; Sar-CoV-2.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declared no conflict of interest.
Figures
Comment in
-
Rapid antigen test for SARS-CoV-2 and primary health care.J Infect. 2021 Aug;83(2):237-279. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2021.05.001. Epub 2021 May 8. J Infect. 2021. PMID: 33971208 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Diagnostic accuracy of Panbio™ rapid antigen test for SARS-CoV-2 in paediatric population.BMC Pediatr. 2023 Aug 29;23(1):433. doi: 10.1186/s12887-023-04201-z. BMC Pediatr. 2023. PMID: 37644389 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the Abbott Panbio™ COVID-19 antigen detection rapid diagnostic test among healthcare workers in elderly care.PLoS One. 2023 Feb 24;18(2):e0276244. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276244. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 36827362 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic evaluation of Panbio™ antigen rapid diagnostic test for SARS-CoV-2: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Virol Methods. 2023 Nov;321:114811. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2023.114811. Epub 2023 Sep 9. J Virol Methods. 2023. PMID: 37696303
-
Evaluating diagnostic accuracies of Panbio™ test and RT-PCR for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia using Bayesian Latent-Class Models (BLCM).PLoS One. 2022 Oct 19;17(10):e0268160. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268160. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 36260547 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy of rapid point-of-care antigen-based diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression analyzing influencing factors.PLoS Med. 2022 May 26;19(5):e1004011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004011. eCollection 2022 May. PLoS Med. 2022. PMID: 35617375 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
SARS-CoV-2 Diagnostic Tests: Algorithm and Field Evaluation From the Near Patient Testing to the Automated Diagnostic Platform.Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Apr 6;8:650581. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.650581. eCollection 2021. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021. PMID: 33889587 Free PMC article.
-
COVID-19 in Morocco's region: Observational study of prevalence in symptomatic adults using the PANBIOS® rapid antigen test September 2021.Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2023 May 11;17(5):e13142. doi: 10.1111/irv.13142. eCollection 2023 May. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2023. PMID: 37180839 Free PMC article.
-
Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 22;7(7):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35866452 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic accuracy and feasibility of a rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen test in general practice - a prospective multicenter validation and implementation study.BMC Prim Care. 2022 Jun 11;23(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01756-1. BMC Prim Care. 2022. PMID: 35690722 Free PMC article.
-
Performance of Rapid Antigen Tests for COVID-19 Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jan 4;12(1):110. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12010110. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35054277 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Rapid Risk Assessment: increased transmission of COVID-19 in the EU/EEA and the UK – thirteenth update [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Nov 6]. Available from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/covid-19-risk-assessment...
-
- World Health Organization. Antigen-detection in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection using rapid immunoassays. 2020 [cited 2020 Sep 18];369 (6508):1167–8. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/antigen-detection-in-the-diagnos...
-
- Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Interim Guidance for Rapid Antigen Testing for SARS-CoV-2 CDC. 2020; Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/resources/antigen-tests-gu...
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous