Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2021 Jun;11(6):1440-1453.
doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-1465. Epub 2021 Feb 16.

Venetoclax and Navitoclax in Combination with Chemotherapy in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Lymphoblastic Lymphoma

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Venetoclax and Navitoclax in Combination with Chemotherapy in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Lymphoblastic Lymphoma

Vinod A Pullarkat et al. Cancer Discov. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

Combining venetoclax, a selective BCL2 inhibitor, with low-dose navitoclax, a BCL-XL/BCL2 inhibitor, may allow targeting of both BCL2 and BCL-XL without dose-limiting thrombocytopenia associated with navitoclax monotherapy. The safety and preliminary efficacy of venetoclax with low-dose navitoclax and chemotherapy was assessed in this phase I dose-escalation study (NCT03181126) in pediatric and adult patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute lymphoblastic leukemia or lymphoblastic lymphoma. Forty-seven patients received treatment. A recommended phase II dose of 50 mg navitoclax for adults and 25 mg for patients <45 kg with 400 mg adult-equivalent venetoclax was identified. Delayed hematopoietic recovery was the primary safety finding. The complete remission rate was 60%, including responses in patients who had previously received hematopoietic cell transplantation or immunotherapy. Thirteen patients (28%) proceeded to transplantation or CAR T-cell therapy on study. Venetoclax with navitoclax and chemotherapy was well tolerated and had promising efficacy in this heavily pretreated patient population. SIGNIFICANCE: In this phase I study, venetoclax with low-dose navitoclax and chemotherapy was well tolerated and had promising efficacy in patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia or lymphoblastic lymphoma. Responses were observed in patients across histologic and genomic subtypes and in those who failed available therapies including stem cell transplant.See related commentary by Larkin and Byrd, p. 1324.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1307.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Kaplan-Meier plot of overall survival. Overall survival was defined as the number of months from the date of first dose to the date of death. Abbreviations: B-ALL, B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia; LL, lymphoblastic lymphoma; T-ALL, T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Subtype analysis and response. A, Subtype profiles in patients with B-ALL and T-ALL. B, Subtypes assessed based on response. Abbreviations: B-ALL, B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia; BCL-2, B-cell lymphoma 2; BCL2L1, BCL2 like 1; CRi, complete remission with incomplete marrow recovery; CRp, complete remission without platelet recovery; ETP-ALL, early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia; MCL-1, myeloid cell leukemia 1; NR, not reached; Ph, Philadelphia chromosome; T-ALL, T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Burkhardt B, Reiter A, Landmann E, Lang P, Lassay L, Dickerhoff R, et al. Poor outcome for children and adolescents with progressive disease or relapse of lymphoblastic lymphoma: a report from the berlin-frankfurt-muenster group. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2009;27(20):3363–9 doi 10.1200/jco.2008.19.3367. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kantarjian HM, DeAngelo DJ, Stelljes M, Martinelli G, Liedtke M, Stock W, et al. Inotuzumab Ozogamicin versus Standard Therapy for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. N Engl J Med 2016;375(8):740–53 doi 10.1056/NEJMoa1509277. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ko RH, Ji L, Barnette P, Bostrom B, Hutchinson R, Raetz E, et al. Outcome of patients treated for relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Therapeutic Advances in Childhood Leukemia Consortium study. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2010;28(4):648–54 doi 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.2950. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. O’Brien S, Thomas D, Ravandi F, Faderl S, Cortes J, Borthakur G, et al. Outcome of adults with acute lymphocytic leukemia after second salvage therapy. Cancer 2008;113(11):3186–91 doi 10.1002/cncr.23919. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. El-Fattah MA. Prognostic Factors and Outcomes of Adult Lymphoblastic Lymphoma in the United States. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 2017;17(8):498–505 e6 doi 10.1016/j.clml.2017.05.016. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms