Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2021 Feb;7(1):e001519.
doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001519.

Effectiveness and safety of secukinumab in 608 patients with psoriatic arthritis in real life: a 24-month prospective, multicentre study

Collaborators, Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Effectiveness and safety of secukinumab in 608 patients with psoriatic arthritis in real life: a 24-month prospective, multicentre study

Roberta Ramonda et al. RMD Open. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate in a multicentric Italian cohort of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) on secukinumab followed for 24 months: (1) the long-term effectiveness and safety of secukinumab, (2) the drug retention rate and minimal disease activity (MDA), (3) differences in the outcomes according to the biological treatment line: biologic-naïve patients (group A) versus multifailure (group B) patients.

Methods: Consecutive patients with PsA receiving secukinumab were evaluated prospectively. Disease characteristics, previous/ongoing treatments, comorbidities and follow-up duration were collected. Disease activity/functional/clinimetric scores and biochemical values were recorded at baseline (T0), 6(T6), 12(T12) and 24(T24) months. Effectiveness was evaluated overtime with descriptive statistics; multivariate Cox and logistic regression models were used to evaluate predictors of drug-discontinuation and MDA at T6. Infections and adverse events were recorded.

Results: 608 patients (41.28% men; mean (SD) age 52.78 (11.33)) were enrolled; secukinumab was prescribed as first-line biological treatment in 227 (37.34%) patients, as second (or more)-line biological treatment in 381 (62.66%). Effectiveness of secukinumab was shown with an improvement in several outcomes, such as Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (T0=3.26 (0.88) vs T24=1.60 (0.69) ;p=0.02) and Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (T0=25.29 (11.14) vs T24=7.69 (4.51); p<0.01). At T24, group A showed lower Psoriasis Area Severity Index (p=0.04), erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C reactive protein (p=0.03 ;p=0.05) and joint count (p=0.03) compared with group B. At T24, MDA was achieved in 75.71% of group A and 70.37% of group B. Treatment was discontinued in 123 (20.23%) patients, mainly due to primary/secondary loss of effectiveness, and in 22 due to adverse events. Retention rate at T24 was 71% in the whole population, with some difference depending on secukinumab dosage (p=0.004) and gender (p=0.05).

Conclusions: In a real-life clinical setting, secukimumab proved safe and effective in all PsA domains, with notable drug retention rate.

Keywords: antirheumatic agents; arthritis; biological therapy; psoriatic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: RR has received honoraria and speaker fees from Novartis, AbbVie, Pfizer, MSD, Janssen. AM has received honoraria and speaker fees from AbbVie, Pfizer, MSD, UCB, Novartis, Janssen, Eli-Lilly. LS speaker from Jansen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, MSD, Sanofi.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Minimal disease activity (MDA) (percentage, %) of overall population and after their subdivision in two groups, according to the lines of the disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs treatment (group A, or bio-naïve vs group B, or non-bio-naïve patients) (A), dosage of secukinumab (150 vs 300 mg/injection) (B), gender (C) and body mass index (BMI) (overweight vs normal weight) (D). ns, not statistically significant; PsA, psoriatic arthritis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Drug survival in the overall population and after their subdivision in two groups, according to the lines of the disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs treatment (group A, or bio-naïve vs group B, or non-bio-naïve patients) (A), dosage of secukinumab (150 vs 300 mg/injection) (B), gender (C) and body mass index (BMI) (overweight vs normal weight) (D).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gladman DD, Antoni C, Mease P, et al. . Psoriatic arthritis: epidemiology, clinical features, course, and outcome. Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64 Suppl 2:ii14–17. 10.1136/ard.2004.032482 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chandran V, Raychaudhuri SP. Geoepidemiology and environmental factors of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. J Autoimmun 2010;34:J314–21. 10.1016/j.jaut.2009.12.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mease PJ, Armstrong AW. Managing patients with psoriatic disease: the diagnosis and pharmacologic treatment of psoriatic arthritis in patients with psoriasis. Drugs 2014;74:423–41. 10.1007/s40265-014-0191-y - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Scotti L, Franchi M, Marchesoni A, et al. . Prevalence and incidence of psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2018;48:28–34. 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.01.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ogdie A, Weiss P. The epidemiology of psoriatic arthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2015;41:545–68. 10.1016/j.rdc.2015.07.001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances