Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May;24(3):395-406.
doi: 10.1007/s10071-021-01488-2. Epub 2021 Feb 17.

Understanding fish cognition: a review and appraisal of current practices

Affiliations
Review

Understanding fish cognition: a review and appraisal of current practices

Matthew G Salena et al. Anim Cogn. 2021 May.

Abstract

With over 30,000 recognized species, fishes exhibit an extraordinary variety of morphological, behavioural, and life-history traits. The field of fish cognition has grown markedly with numerous studies on fish spatial navigation, numeracy, learning, decision-making, and even theory of mind. However, most cognitive research on fishes takes place in a highly controlled laboratory environment and it can therefore be difficult to determine whether findings generalize to the ecology of wild fishes. Here, we summarize four prominent research areas in fish cognition, highlighting some of the recent advances and key findings. Next, we survey the literature, targeting these four areas, and quantify the nearly ubiquitous use of captive-bred individuals and a heavy reliance on lab-based research. We then discuss common practices that occur prior to experimentation and within experiments that could hinder our ability to make more general conclusions about fish cognition, and suggest possible solutions. By complementing ecologically relevant laboratory-based studies with in situ cognitive tests, we will gain further inroads toward unraveling how fishes learn and make decisions about food, mates, and territories.

Keywords: Behavior; Decision-making; Intelligence; Learning; Memory; Teleosts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Agrillo C, Dadda M, Serena G, Bisazza A (2008) Do fish count? Spontaneous discrimination of quantity in female mosquitofish. Anim Cogn 11:495–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-008-0140-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Agrillo C, Dadda M, Serena G, Bisazza A (2009) Use of number by fish. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004786 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Agrillo C, Piffer L, Bisazza A (2011) Number versus continuous quantity in numerosity judgments by fish. Cognition 119:281–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.022 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Agrillo C, Petrazzini MEM, Bisazza A (2017) Numerical abilities in fish: a methodological review. Behav Process 141:161–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2017.02.001 - DOI
    1. Aoki R, Tsuboi T, Okamoto H (2015) Y-maze avoidance: An automated and rapid associative learning paradigm in zebrafish. J Neurosci Res 91:69–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2014.10.012 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources