Failure of ureteral stents subject to extrinsic ureteral obstruction and stent occlusions
- PMID: 33595820
- DOI: 10.1007/s11255-021-02810-0
Failure of ureteral stents subject to extrinsic ureteral obstruction and stent occlusions
Abstract
Purpose: To quantify the occurrence of stent failure and the dynamic behavior of urine flow in ureter-stent systems, including the relative flow in the ureter and stent lumina, subject to various degrees of ureter and stent blockage.
Methods: Numerical simulations based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) were used to quantify urine flow behavior in stented ureters, in the presence of extrinsic ureteral obstruction (EUO) and stent occlusions. Two stented ureter configurations were considered, one with circumferential occlusion of the ureter and the second with pressure on one side of the ureter wall. The pressure within the renal unit for different degrees of ureter closure and stent lumen occlusion was determined systematically. Onset of stent failure and the distribution of urine flow between stent and ureter lumina were determined.
Results: In the case of EUO completely encircling the ureter, causing 100% obstruction of the ureter lumen, pressure in the renal unit is essentially unaffected until the stent lumen reaches ~ 90% occlusion, and fails only with > 95% occlusion. Occlusions of 50% in stent side holes in the vicinity of the EUO only alter local flow patterns but have no significant influence on renal unit pressure. For EUO deforming and compressing the ureter from one side, with ~ 50% reduction in ureter lumen, urine drainage proceeds with negligible increase in renal pressure even with 100% occlusion in the stent lumen.
Conclusion: CFD simulations show that stent failure under EUO tends to occur suddenly, only when both ureter and stent lumina become almost fully blocked.
Keywords: Computational fluid dynamics; Numerical simulation; Renal unit pressure; Stent failure; Stent incrustation.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. part of Springer Nature.
Comment in
-
Letter to the editor, international urology and nephrology-in silico-in vitro-in vivo: can numerical simulations based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) replace studies of the urinary tract?Int Urol Nephrol. 2021 Sep;53(9):1835-1836. doi: 10.1007/s11255-021-02869-9. Epub 2021 Apr 29. Int Urol Nephrol. 2021. PMID: 33928476 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Influence of Single Stent Size and Tandem Stents Subject to Extrinsic Ureteral Obstruction and Stent Occlusion on Stent Failure.J Endourol. 2022 Feb;36(2):236-242. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0426. J Endourol. 2022. PMID: 34314233
-
Magnetic resonance imaging of in vitro urine flow in single and tandem stented ureters subject to extrinsic ureteral obstruction.Int J Urol. 2022 Oct;29(10):1221-1226. doi: 10.1111/iju.14942. Epub 2022 Jun 1. Int J Urol. 2022. PMID: 35649584 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of Colloidal Fluid on Stent Failure Under Extrinsic Ureteral Obstruction: An In Vitro Experimental Study.J Endourol. 2020 Sep;34(9):987-992. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0330. Epub 2020 Jul 17. J Endourol. 2020. PMID: 32539472
-
Stenting for malignant ureteral obstruction: Tandem, metal or metal-mesh stents.Int J Urol. 2015 Jul;22(7):629-36. doi: 10.1111/iju.12795. Epub 2015 May 6. Int J Urol. 2015. PMID: 25950837 Review.
-
[Tandem ureteral stenting].Urologiia. 2024 Dec;(6):165-171. Urologiia. 2024. PMID: 40377569 Review. Russian.
Cited by
-
Imaging and Chemical Analysis of External and Internal Ureteral Stent Encrustation.Res Rep Urol. 2022 Apr 23;14:159-166. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S364336. eCollection 2022. Res Rep Urol. 2022. PMID: 35493770 Free PMC article.
-
Drainage of infected kidneys with ureteral stents: does size matter?World J Urol. 2022 Aug;40(8):2041-2046. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04070-8. Epub 2022 Jun 22. World J Urol. 2022. PMID: 35731266
-
The accumulation of particles in ureteric stents is mediated by flow dynamics: Full-scale computational and experimental modeling of the occluded and unoccluded ureter.APL Bioeng. 2022 May 5;6(2):026102. doi: 10.1063/5.0083260. eCollection 2022 Jun. APL Bioeng. 2022. PMID: 35540726 Free PMC article.
-
Letter to the editor, international urology and nephrology-in silico-in vitro-in vivo: can numerical simulations based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) replace studies of the urinary tract?Int Urol Nephrol. 2021 Sep;53(9):1835-1836. doi: 10.1007/s11255-021-02869-9. Epub 2021 Apr 29. Int Urol Nephrol. 2021. PMID: 33928476 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Comparative study of renal drainage with different ureteral stents subject to extrinsic ureteral obstruction using an in vitro ureter-stent model.BMC Urol. 2021 Jul 14;21(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12894-021-00865-w. BMC Urol. 2021. PMID: 34261481 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Docimo SG, DeWolf WC (1989) High failure rate of indwelling ureteral stents in patients with extrinsic obstruction: experience at 2 institutions. J Urol 142:277–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)38729-3 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Chung SY, Stein RJ, Landsittel D, Davies BJ, Cuellar DC, Hrebinko RL, Tarin T, Averch TD (2004) 15-year experience with the management of extrinsic ureteral obstruction with indwelling ureteral stents. J Urol 172:592–595. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000130510.28768.f5 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Christman MS, L’Esperance JO, Choe CH, Stroup SP, Auge BK (2009) Analysis of ureteral stent compression force and its role in malignant obstruction. J Urol 181:392–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.08.125 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Hendlin K, Vedula K, Horn C, Monga M (2006) In vitro evaluation of ureteral stent compression. Urol 67:679–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2005.10.038 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Christman MS, L’Esperance JO, Choe CH, Stroup SP, Auge BK (2009) Analysis of ureteric stent kinking forces: the role of curvature in stent failure. BJUI 105:866–869. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08833.x - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous