Effect of Pain Education, Cryotherapy, and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on the Pain, Functional Capacity, and Quality of Life in Patients With Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
- PMID: 33595936
- DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001552
Effect of Pain Education, Cryotherapy, and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on the Pain, Functional Capacity, and Quality of Life in Patients With Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Objective: The aim of the study was to analyze the effects of pain education and the combined use of cryotherapy and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on the pain sensation, functional capacity, and quality of life of patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain.
Design: This is a randomized controlled and blind clinical trial including patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain in the following 4 groups: control group, cryotherapy group, burst transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation group, and cryotherapy combined with burst transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation group. They were evaluated at baseline and after the protocol was concluded using the following: Roland-Morris questionnaire and sit-to-stand test; quality-of-life questionnaire; and pain. The protocol consisted of 10 sessions with pain education associated the combination of the electrophysical agents.
Results: There were no statistical differences between groups after the intervention protocol. In the within analysis, all groups presented an improvement in visual analog scale scores, Roland-Morris questionnaire, sit-to-stand test, and pain domain of quality-of-life questionnaire.
Conclusions: This study showed that with pain education, there was no difference between cryotherapy and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation alone, combined, or placebo mode in improving pain, functional capacity, and quality of life in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain.
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Financial disclosure statements have been obtained, and no conflicts of interest have been reported by the authors or by any individuals in control of the content of this article.
References
-
- Becker A, Held H, Redaelli M, et al.: Low back pain in primary care: costs of care and prediction of future health care utilization. Spine 2010;35:171420
-
- Maher C, Underwood M, Buchbinder R: Non-specific low back pain. Lancet 2017;389:736–47
-
- Mlekusch S, Schliessbach J, Camara RJ, et al.: Do central hypersensitivity and altered pain modulation predict the course of chronic low back and neck pain? Clin J Pain 2013;29:673–80
-
- Maniadakis N, Gray A: The economic burden of back pain in the UK. Pain 2000;84:95–103
-
- Nijs J, Meeus M, Cagnie B, et al.: A modern neuroscience approach to chronic spinal pain: combining pain neuroscience education with cognition-targeted motor control training. PhysTher 2014;94:730–8
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
