Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 17;16(2):e0246475.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246475. eCollection 2021.

Direct healthcare costs of lip, oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer in Brazil

Affiliations

Direct healthcare costs of lip, oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer in Brazil

Vanessa Milani et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

The efficiency of public policies includes the measurement of the health resources used and their associated costs. There is a lack of studies evaluating the economic impact of oral cancer (OC). This study aims to estimate the healthcare costs of OC in Brazil from 2008 to 2016. This is a partial economic evaluation using the gross costing top-down method, considering the direct healthcare costs related to outpatients, inpatients, intensive care units, and the number of procedures, from the perspective of the public health sector. The data were extracted from the Outpatient and Inpatient Information System of the National Health System, by diagnosis according to the 10th Revision of the International Classification of Diseases, according to sites of interest: C00 to C06, C09 and C10. The values were adjusted for annual accumulated inflation and expressed in 2018 I$ (1 I$ = R$2,044). Expenditure on OC healthcare in Brazil was I$495.6 million, which was composed of 50.8% (I$251.6 million) outpatient and 49.2% (I$244.0 million) inpatient healthcare. About 177,317 admissions and 6,224,236 outpatient procedures were registered. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy comprised the largest number of procedures (88.8%) and costs (94.9%). Most of the costs were spent on people over 50 years old (72.9%) and on males (75.6%). Direct healthcare costs in Brazil for OC are substantial. Outpatient procedures were responsible for the highest total cost; however, inpatient procedures had a higher cost per procedure. Men over 50 years old consumed most of the cost and procedures for OC. The oropharynx and tongue were the sites with the highest expenditure. Further studies are needed to investigate the cost per individual, as well as direct non-medical and indirect costs of OC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. Llewellyn CD, Johnson NW, Warnakulasuriya KAAS. Risk factors for squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity in young people—a comprehensive literature review. Oral Oncol. 2001;37(5):401–18. 10.1016/s1368-8375(00)00135-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Conway DI, Stockton DL, Warnakulasuriya KAAS, Ogden G, Macpherson LMD. Incidence of oral and oropharyngeal cancer in United Kingdom (1990–1999)—recent trends and regional variation. Oral Oncol. 2006;42(6):586–92. 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2005.10.018 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sankaranarayanan R, Ramadas K, Amarishe H, Subramanian S, Johnson N. Oral cancer: prevention, early detection, and treatment In: Gelband H, Jha P, Sankaranarayanan R, Horton S, editors. Cancer: disease control priorities. 3rd ed World Bank Group; 2015. - PubMed
    1. Campolina AG, Yuba TY, Decimoni TC, Roseli L, Diz MPE, Novaes H, et al. Health economic evaluations of cancer in Brazil: a systematic review. Frontiers in Public Health, 2018; 6:205 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00205 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mandal R, Basu P. Cancer screening and early diagnosis in low and middle income countries: current situation and future perspectives. Bundesgesundheitsbl. 2018;61:1505 10.1007/s00103-018-2833-9 - DOI - PubMed