Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2021 Feb 18;384(7):630-642.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2008283.

Treatment of Uterine Fibroid Symptoms with Relugolix Combination Therapy

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Treatment of Uterine Fibroid Symptoms with Relugolix Combination Therapy

Ayman Al-Hendy et al. N Engl J Med. .

Abstract

Background: Uterine fibroids are a common cause of heavy menstrual bleeding and pain. Treatment with the combination of relugolix (an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone-receptor antagonist), estradiol, and norethindrone acetate, administered once daily, may have efficacy in women with uterine fibroids and heavy bleeding while avoiding hypoestrogenic effects.

Methods: We conducted two replicate international, double-blind, 24-week, phase 3 trials involving women with fibroid-associated heavy menstrual bleeding. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive once-daily placebo, relugolix combination therapy (40 mg of relugolix, 1 mg of estradiol, and 0.5 mg of norethindrone acetate), or delayed relugolix combination therapy (40 mg of relugolix monotherapy, followed by relugolix combination therapy, each for 12 weeks). The primary efficacy end point in each trial was the percentage of participants with a response (volume of menstrual blood loss <80 ml and a ≥50% reduction in volume from baseline) in the relugolix combination therapy group, as compared with the placebo group. Key secondary end points were amenorrhea, volume of menstrual blood loss, distress from bleeding and pelvic discomfort, anemia, pain, fibroid volume, and uterine volume. Safety and bone mineral density were assessed.

Results: A total of 388 women in trial L1 and 382 in trial L2 underwent randomization. A total of 73% of the participants in the relugolix combination therapy group in trial L1 and 71% of those in trial L2 had a response (primary end point), as compared with 19% and 15%, respectively, of those in the placebo groups (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Both relugolix combination therapy groups had significant improvements, as compared with the placebo groups, in six of seven key secondary end points, including measures of menstrual blood loss (including amenorrhea), pain, distress from bleeding and pelvic discomfort, anemia, and uterine volume, but not fibroid volume. The incidence of adverse events was similar with relugolix combination therapy and placebo. Bone mineral density was similar with relugolix combination therapy and placebo but decreased with relugolix monotherapy.

Conclusions: Once-daily relugolix combination therapy resulted in a significant reduction in menstrual bleeding, as compared with placebo, and preserved bone mineral density in women with uterine fibroids. (Funded by Myovant Sciences; LIBERTY 1 [L1] and LIBERTY 2 [L2] ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT03049735 and NCT03103087, respectively.).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Participants with Reduction in Heavy Menstrual Bleeding.
Shown are the percentages of women who had a response, which was defined as a volume of menstrual blood loss of less than 80 ml and a reduction of at least 50% from the baseline volume of menstrual blood loss, as measured by the alkaline hematin method, over the last 35 days of the treatment period. The primary end-point analysis in each trial was the comparison of relugolix combination therapy with placebo. CI denotes confidence interval, L1 LIBERTY 1, and L2 LIBERTY 2.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Change in Bone Mineral Density.
Least-squares means were based on mixed-effects models with baseline volume of menstrual blood loss, geographic region, age at baseline, body-mass index at baseline, bone mineral density at baseline, race, visit, and trial group–by–visit interaction as fixed effects. The dashed line indicates baseline, and the I bars 95% confidence intervals.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Baird DD, Dunson DB, Hill MC, Cousins D, Schectman JM. High cumulative incidence of uterine leiomyoma in black and white women: ultrasound evidence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188: 100–7. - PubMed
    1. Wise LA, Laughlin-Tommaso SK. Epidemiology of uterine fibroids: from menarche to menopause. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2016; 59: 2–24. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Laughlin-Tommaso SK, Stewart EA. Moving toward individualized medicine for uterine leiomyomas. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 132: 961–71. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Borah BJ, Nicholson WK, Bradley L, Stewart EA. The impact of uterine leiomyomas: a national survey of affected women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209(4): 319.e1–319.e20. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stewart EA. Uterine fibroids. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 1646–55. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data