Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation Patients
- PMID: 33596677
- DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031007
Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation Patients
Abstract
Background and purpose: Several observational studies have compared the effect of the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants to each other in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, confounding by indication is a major problem when comparing non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant treatments in some of these studies. This meta-analysis was conducted to compare the effectiveness and safety between non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant by only including the propensity score matching studies.
Methods: We systematically searched the PubMed and Ovid databases until May 2020 to identify relevant observational studies. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs of the reported outcomes were collected and then pooled by a random-effects model complemented with an inverse variance heterogeneity or quality effects model.
Results: A total of 17 retrospective cohort studies were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with dabigatran use, the use of rivaroxaban was significantly associated with increased risks of stroke or systemic embolism (HR, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.05-1.29]) and major bleeding (HR, 1.32 [95% CI, 1.24-1.41]), whereas the use of apixaban was associated with a reduced risk of major bleeding (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.67-0.90]) but not stroke or systemic embolism (HR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.56-1.28]). Compared with rivaroxaban use, the use of apixaban was associated with a decreased risk of major bleeding (HR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.54-0.73]) but not stroke or systemic embolism (HR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.67-1.04]). Reanalyses with the inverse variance heterogeneity or quality effects model produced similar results as the random-effects model.
Conclusions: Current observational comparisons with propensity score matching methods suggest that apixaban might be a better choice compared with dabigatran or rivaroxaban for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation patients.
Keywords: anticoagulants; apixaban; atrial fibrillation; propensity score; safety.
Similar articles
-
Direct comparative effectiveness and safety between non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.Eur J Epidemiol. 2019 Feb;34(2):173-190. doi: 10.1007/s10654-018-0415-7. Epub 2018 Jun 8. Eur J Epidemiol. 2019. PMID: 29948370
-
Real-World Setting Comparison of Nonvitamin-K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin-K Antagonists for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Stroke. 2017 Sep;48(9):2494-2503. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017549. Epub 2017 Jul 17. Stroke. 2017. PMID: 28716982
-
Effectiveness and Safety of Oral Anticoagulants Among Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients.Stroke. 2018 Dec;49(12):2933-2944. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.020232. Stroke. 2018. PMID: 30571400 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a Canadian multicentre observational cohort study.CMAJ Open. 2020 Dec 18;8(4):E877-E886. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200055. Print 2020 Oct-Dec. CMAJ Open. 2020. PMID: 33355273 Free PMC article.
-
Direct Comparison of Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Apixaban for Effectiveness and Safety in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.Chest. 2016 Dec;150(6):1302-1312. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.07.013. Epub 2016 Sep 28. Chest. 2016. PMID: 27938741
Cited by
-
Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in atrial fibrillation patients with heart failure and preserved, mildly reduced, and reduced ejection fraction: A systemic review and meta-analysis.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jul 29;9:949726. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.949726. eCollection 2022. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022. PMID: 35966544 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation with prior gastrointestinal bleeding: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jul 27;9:937320. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.937320. eCollection 2022. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022. PMID: 35966547 Free PMC article.
-
Meta-Analysis of Oral Anticoagulants and Adverse Outcomes in Atrial Fibrillation Patients After Intracranial Hemorrhage.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jul 15;9:961000. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.961000. eCollection 2022. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022. PMID: 35911529 Free PMC article.
-
Association of Coffee Consumption With Atrial Fibrillation Risk: An Updated Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jul 6;9:894664. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.894664. eCollection 2022. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022. PMID: 35872898 Free PMC article.
-
Oral Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation After Intracranial Hemorrhage: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2025 Jan-Dec;31:10760296251368889. doi: 10.1177/10760296251368889. Epub 2025 Aug 21. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2025. PMID: 40836668 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical