Oral feeding for infants and children receiving nasal continuous positive airway pressure and high flow nasal cannula: a systematic review
- PMID: 33596866
- PMCID: PMC7887825
- DOI: 10.1186/s12887-021-02531-4
Oral feeding for infants and children receiving nasal continuous positive airway pressure and high flow nasal cannula: a systematic review
Abstract
Background: The aim of this systematic review was to determine whether introduction of oral feeding for infants and children receiving nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) or high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) respiratory support facilitates achievement of full oral feeding without adverse effects, compared to no oral feeding (NPO; nil per oral) on CPAP or HFNC.
Methods: A protocol was lodged with the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. We searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL, CENTRAL and AustHealth from database inception to 10th June 2020. Study population included children (preterm to < 18 years) on nCPAP or HFNC who were orally feeding. Primary outcomes included full or partial oral feeding and oropharyngeal aspiration. Secondary outcomes examined adverse events including clinical signs of aspiration, aspiration pneumonia and deterioration in respiratory status.
Results: The search retrieved 1684 studies following duplicate removal. Title and abstract screening identified 70 studies for full text screening and of these, 16 were included in the review for data extraction. Methods of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) included nCPAP (n = 6), nCPAP and HFNC (n = 5) and HFNC (n = 5). A metanalysis was not possible as respiratory modes and cohorts were not comparable. Eleven studies reported on adverse events. Oral feeding safety was predominantly based on retrospective data from chart entries and clinical signs, with only one study using an instrumental swallow evaluation (VFSS) to determine aspiration status.
Conclusions: Findings are insufficient to conclude whether commencing oral feeding whilst on nCPAP or HFNC facilitates transition to full oral feeding without adverse effects, including oropharyngeal aspiration. Further research is required to determine the safety and efficacy of oral feeding on CPAP and HFNC for infants and children.
Trial registration: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42016039325 .
Keywords: HFNC; Oral feeding; Pediatric; Swallowing; nCPAP.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Oral Feeding for Infants and Children Receiving Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and High-Flow Nasal Cannula Respiratory Supports: A Survey of Practice.Dysphagia. 2020 Jun;35(3):443-454. doi: 10.1007/s00455-019-10047-4. Epub 2019 Aug 26. Dysphagia. 2020. PMID: 31451906
-
High-Flow Nasal Cannula versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Primary Respiratory Support in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Neonatology. 2018;113(3):235-241. doi: 10.1159/000484400. Epub 2018 Jan 23. Neonatology. 2018. PMID: 29393237 Clinical Trial.
-
High-flow nasal cannula versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory support in preterm infants: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Jan;34(2):259-266. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1606193. Epub 2019 Apr 24. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021. PMID: 30966839
-
High Flow Nasal Cannula for Weaning Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Neonatology. 2024;121(3):359-369. doi: 10.1159/000536464. Epub 2024 Feb 27. Neonatology. 2024. PMID: 38412846 Free PMC article.
-
Rapid systematic review shows that using a high-flow nasal cannula is inferior to nasal continuous positive airway pressure as first-line support in preterm neonates.Acta Paediatr. 2018 Oct;107(10):1684-1696. doi: 10.1111/apa.14396. Epub 2018 Jun 1. Acta Paediatr. 2018. PMID: 29751368
Cited by
-
Speech-language therapists' views of oral feeding of infants on high-flow oxygen.Health SA. 2025 Feb 14;30:2809. doi: 10.4102/hsag.v30i0.2809. eCollection 2025. Health SA. 2025. PMID: 40062352 Free PMC article.
-
Oral stimulation for promoting oral feeding in preterm infants.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jun 20;6(6):CD009720. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009720.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 37338236 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Introduction of oral feeding in premature infants on high flow nasal cannula in a level IV neonatal intensive care unit: a quality improvement initiative.J Perinatol. 2024 Nov;44(11):1692-1699. doi: 10.1038/s41372-024-01917-3. Epub 2024 May 7. J Perinatol. 2024. PMID: 38714842
-
Oral feeding practices in medically complex infants receiving prolonged high-flow nasal cannula support: A retrospective cohort study.J Paediatr Child Health. 2024 Dec;60(12):796-802. doi: 10.1111/jpc.16679. Epub 2024 Sep 30. J Paediatr Child Health. 2024. PMID: 39344800 Free PMC article.
-
Developmental care pathway for hospitalised infants with CHD: on behalf of the Cardiac Newborn Neuroprotective Network, a Special Interest Group of the Cardiac Neurodevelopmental Outcome Collaborative.Cardiol Young. 2023 Dec;33(12):2521-2538. doi: 10.1017/S1047951123000525. Epub 2023 Mar 30. Cardiol Young. 2023. PMID: 36994672 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Lee JH, Rehder KJ, Williford L, Cheifetz IM, Turner DA. Use of high flow nasal cannula in critically ill infants, children, and adults: a critical review of the literature. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39(2):247–257. - PubMed
-
- Morley SL. Non-invasive ventilation in paediatric critical care. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2016;20:24–31. - PubMed
-
- Coletti KD, Bagdure DN, Walker LK, Remy KE, Custer JW. High-flow nasal cannula utilization in pediatric critical care. Respir Care. 2017;62(8):1023–1029. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources