The effectiveness of different patient referral systems to shorten waiting times for elective surgeries: systematic review
- PMID: 33596882
- PMCID: PMC7887721
- DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06140-w
The effectiveness of different patient referral systems to shorten waiting times for elective surgeries: systematic review
Abstract
Background: Long waiting times for elective surgery are common to many publicly funded health systems. Inefficiencies in referral systems in high-income countries are more pronounced than lower and middle-income countries. Primary care practitioners play a major role in determining which patients are referred to surgeon and might represent an opportunity to improve this situation. With conventional methods of referrals, surgery clinics are often overcrowded with non-surgical referrals and surgical patients experience longer waiting times as a consequence. Improving the quality of referral communications should lead to more timely access and better cost-effectiveness for elective surgical care. This review summarises the research evidence for effective interventions within the scope of primary-care referral methods in the surgical care pathway that might shorten waiting time for elective surgeries.
Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases in December-2019 to January-2020, for articles published after 2013. Eligibility criteria included major elective surgery lists of adult patients, excluding cancer related surgeries. Both randomised and non-randomised controlled studies were eligible. The quality of evidence was assessed using ROBINS-I, AMSTAR 2 and CASP, as appropriate to the study method used. The review presentation was limited to a narrative synthesis because of heterogeneity. The PROSPERO registration number is CRD42019158455.
Results: The electronic search yielded 7543 records. Finally, nine articles were considered as eligible after deduplication and full article screening. The eligible research varied widely in design, scope, reported outcomes and overall quality, with one randomised trial, two quasi-experimental studies, two longitudinal follow up studies, three systematic reviews and one observational study. All the six original articles were based on referral methods in high-income countries. The included research showed that patient triage and prioritisation at the referral stage improved timely access and increased the number of consultations of surgical patients in clinics.
Conclusions: The available studies included a variety of interventions and were of medium to high quality researches. Managing patient referrals with proper triaging and prioritisation using structured referral formats is likely to be effective in health systems to shorten the waiting times for elective surgeries, specifically in high-income countries.
Keywords: Elective surgery; Health systems; Primary care practitioner; Referral methods; Systematic review; Waiting list; Waiting time.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Patient prioritisation methods to shorten waiting times for elective surgery: A systematic review of how to improve access to surgery.PLoS One. 2021 Aug 30;16(8):e0256578. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256578. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34460854 Free PMC article.
-
Global strategies to reduce elective surgery waiting times for sustainable health outcomes: a systematic review.Hosp Pract (1995). 2025 Feb;53(1):2435802. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2024.2435802. Epub 2024 Dec 3. Hosp Pract (1995). 2025. PMID: 39625159
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
Uptake of referrals for women with positive perinatal depression screening results and the effectiveness of interventions to increase uptake: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2020 Jul 17;29:e143. doi: 10.1017/S2045796020000554. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2020. PMID: 32677601 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating the primary-to-specialist referral system for elective hip and knee arthroplasty.J Eval Clin Pract. 2014 Feb;20(1):66-73. doi: 10.1111/jep.12080. Epub 2013 Sep 5. J Eval Clin Pract. 2014. PMID: 24004242
Cited by
-
Identifying and prioritizing inefficiency causes in Iran's health system.Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2024 Nov 12;22(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12962-024-00593-6. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2024. PMID: 39533362 Free PMC article.
-
Development and Feasibility Study of a Triage Tool for Early Referral to Spinal Cord Stimulation for Patients With Chronic Low Back and Leg Pain.Eur J Pain. 2025 Feb;29(2):e4780. doi: 10.1002/ejp.4780. Eur J Pain. 2025. PMID: 39757549 Free PMC article.
-
Patient prioritisation methods to shorten waiting times for elective surgery: A systematic review of how to improve access to surgery.PLoS One. 2021 Aug 30;16(8):e0256578. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256578. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34460854 Free PMC article.
-
Scenarios to Improve the Patient Experience Time in a Tertiary Academic Hospital Using Simulation.Cureus. 2022 Oct 27;14(10):e30751. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30751. eCollection 2022 Oct. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 36447722 Free PMC article.
-
Analyzing historical and future acute neurosurgical demand using an AI-enabled predictive dashboard.Sci Rep. 2022 May 9;12(1):7603. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11607-9. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 35534601 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Curtis JA, Russell COH, Stoelwinder U, Mcneill J. Waiting lists and elective surgery: ordering the queue. Med J Aust. 2010;192(4):4. - PubMed
-
- Morris J. The growing problem of treatment waiting times: Nuffield Trust; 2019 [Available from: https://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/news-item/the-growing-problem-of-treatm....
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources