Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 17;21(1):155.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06140-w.

The effectiveness of different patient referral systems to shorten waiting times for elective surgeries: systematic review

Affiliations

The effectiveness of different patient referral systems to shorten waiting times for elective surgeries: systematic review

Dimuthu Rathnayake et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Long waiting times for elective surgery are common to many publicly funded health systems. Inefficiencies in referral systems in high-income countries are more pronounced than lower and middle-income countries. Primary care practitioners play a major role in determining which patients are referred to surgeon and might represent an opportunity to improve this situation. With conventional methods of referrals, surgery clinics are often overcrowded with non-surgical referrals and surgical patients experience longer waiting times as a consequence. Improving the quality of referral communications should lead to more timely access and better cost-effectiveness for elective surgical care. This review summarises the research evidence for effective interventions within the scope of primary-care referral methods in the surgical care pathway that might shorten waiting time for elective surgeries.

Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases in December-2019 to January-2020, for articles published after 2013. Eligibility criteria included major elective surgery lists of adult patients, excluding cancer related surgeries. Both randomised and non-randomised controlled studies were eligible. The quality of evidence was assessed using ROBINS-I, AMSTAR 2 and CASP, as appropriate to the study method used. The review presentation was limited to a narrative synthesis because of heterogeneity. The PROSPERO registration number is CRD42019158455.

Results: The electronic search yielded 7543 records. Finally, nine articles were considered as eligible after deduplication and full article screening. The eligible research varied widely in design, scope, reported outcomes and overall quality, with one randomised trial, two quasi-experimental studies, two longitudinal follow up studies, three systematic reviews and one observational study. All the six original articles were based on referral methods in high-income countries. The included research showed that patient triage and prioritisation at the referral stage improved timely access and increased the number of consultations of surgical patients in clinics.

Conclusions: The available studies included a variety of interventions and were of medium to high quality researches. Managing patient referrals with proper triaging and prioritisation using structured referral formats is likely to be effective in health systems to shorten the waiting times for elective surgeries, specifically in high-income countries.

Keywords: Elective surgery; Health systems; Primary care practitioner; Referral methods; Systematic review; Waiting list; Waiting time.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram for the eligible article selection for the systematic review
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Traffic-light plot for the risk of bias domains in ROBINS-I for the five relevant studies
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Bar diagram for each risk of bias domains in ROBINS-I for the five relevant studies

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fabbri E, Zoli M, Gonzalez-Freire M, Salive ME, Studenski SA, Ferrucci L. Aging and multimorbidity: new tasks, priorities, and Frontiers for integrated Gerontological and clinical research. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015;16(8):640–647. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.03.013. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Salisbury C. Multimorbidity: redesigning health care for people who use it. Lancet. 2012;380(9836):7–9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60482-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Curtis JA, Russell COH, Stoelwinder U, Mcneill J. Waiting lists and elective surgery: ordering the queue. Med J Aust. 2010;192(4):4. - PubMed
    1. Iacobucci G. Waiting list for elective surgery tops four million for first time since 2007. BMJ. 2017;358:j3861. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3861. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Morris J. The growing problem of treatment waiting times: Nuffield Trust; 2019 [Available from: https://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/news-item/the-growing-problem-of-treatm....

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources