Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 17;21(1):154.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06133-9.

Differences in ambulatory care fragmentation by race

Affiliations

Differences in ambulatory care fragmentation by race

Lisa M Kern et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: More fragmented ambulatory care (i.e., care spread across many providers without a dominant provider) has been associated with more subsequent healthcare utilization (such as more tests, procedures, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations) than less fragmented ambulatory care. It is not known if race and socioeconomic status are associated with fragmented ambulatory care.

Methods: We conducted a longitudinal analysis of data from the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study, using the REGARDS baseline visit plus the first year of follow-up. We included participants ≥65 years old, who had linked fee-for-service Medicare claims, and ≥ 4 ambulatory visits in the first year of follow-up. We used Tobit regression to determine the associations between race, annual household income, and educational attainment at baseline and fragmentation score in the subsequent year (as measured with the reversed Bice-Boxerman Index). Covariates included other demographic characteristics, medical conditions, medication use, health behaviors, and psychosocial variables. Additional analyses categorized visits by the type of provider (primary care vs. specialist).

Results: The study participants (N = 6799) had an average age of 73.0 years, 53% were female, and 30% were black. Nearly half had low annual household income (<$35,000) and 41% had a high school education or less. Overall, participants had a median of 10 ambulatory visits to 4 providers in the 12 months following their baseline study visit. Participants in the highest quintile of fragmentation scores had a median of 11 visits to 7 providers. Black race was associated with an absolute adjusted 3% lower fragmentation score compared to white race (95% confidence interval (2% lower to 4% lower; p < 0.001). This difference was explained by blacks seeing fewer specialists than whites. Income and education were not independent predictors of fragmentation scores.

Conclusions: Among Medicare beneficiaries, blacks had less fragmented ambulatory care than whites, due to lower utilization of specialty care. Future research is needed to determine the effect of fragmented care on health outcomes for blacks and whites.

Keywords: Ambulatory care; Medicare; Race factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Kern is a consultant to Mathematica, Inc. Ms. Rajan is a consultant to Veterans Biomedical Research Institute. Drs. Colantonio and Safford receive grant funding from Amgen, Inc. The other authors reported no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Percentage of individuals within each quintile of fragmentation scores by race, income, and education (N = 6799)*

References

    1. Kern LM, Seirup J, Rajan M, Jawahar R, Stuard SS. Fragmented ambulatory care and subsequent healthcare utilization among Medicare beneficiaries. Am J Manag Care. 2018;24:e278–ee84. - PubMed
    1. O'Malley AS, Reschovsky JD. Referral and consultation communication between primary care and specialist physicians: finding common ground. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:56–65. - PubMed
    1. Kern LM, Safford MM, Slavin MJ, et al. Patients' and providers' views on the causes and consequences of healthcare fragmentation. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34:899–907. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-04859-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cabana MD, Jee SH. Does continuity of care improve patient outcomes? J Fam Pract. 2004;53:974–980. - PubMed
    1. Saultz JW, Lochner J. Interpersonal continuity of care and care outcomes: a critical review. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3:159–166. doi: 10.1370/afm.285. - DOI - PMC - PubMed