Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug;164(2):463-474.e4.
doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.12.110. Epub 2021 Jan 19.

The long-term fate of ascending aorta aneurysm after wrapping versus replacement

Affiliations
Free article

The long-term fate of ascending aorta aneurysm after wrapping versus replacement

Hyo-Hyun Kim et al. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Aug.
Free article

Abstract

Objective: The study objective was to examine the long-term fate of aortic diameter expansion at 4 cardiac regions (annulus, sinus, ascending aorta, and proximal arch) after wrapping or replacement during aortic valve surgery of the moderately dilated ascending aorta.

Methods: From January 1995 to December 2018, 964 consecutive patients who underwent aortic valve replacement at our institution were reviewed. Of them, 204 (mean age, 60.7 ± 7.4 years) underwent ascending aorta wrapping (n = 96) or replacement (n = 108) for a moderately dilated ascending aorta (40 to 55 mm). The overall fate of the aortic diameter was analyzed with a linear mixed-effect model. The median follow-up duration was 7.1 years.

Results: After propensity score matching, the baseline maximal ascending aortic diameter median value was 47.3 ± 3.1 mm and 49.4 ± 13.5 mm in the wrapping and replacement groups, respectively. The annulus, sinus, and ascending aorta did not redilate in either group. The proximal aortic arch diameter significantly increased over time (0.343 mm/year; P = .006) in the wrapping group but not in the replacement group (0.066 mm/year; P = .649). Multivariable competing risk analysis identified the initial ascending aorta diameter at the wrapping procedure as an independent risk factor of proximal arch redilation (0.071 ± 0.037, P < .001). The cutoff value was an initial ascending aorta diameter of 47.2 mm for the prediction proximal arch redilation (area under the curve, 0.703; P = .014).

Conclusions: Aortic wrapping and replacement may be long-term durable treatment options in patients with a moderately enlarged ascending aorta. We suggest careful evaluation of redilation in the proximal arch after an aorta wrapping procedure.

Keywords: aortic aneurysm; aortic replacement; aortic valve replacement; aortic wrapping; ascending aorta.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • What's in a wrap?
    Van Hoof L, Rega F, Treasure T, Pepper J. Van Hoof L, et al. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Aug;164(2):e77-e78. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.03.070. Epub 2021 Apr 20. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022. PMID: 33888309 No abstract available.
  • Commentary: The moderately dilated ascending aorta: To wrap or not to wrap?
    Hess NR, Chu D. Hess NR, et al. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Aug;164(2):475-476. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.03.088. Epub 2021 Mar 30. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022. PMID: 33894996 No abstract available.
  • Commentary: Yet another take on the wrap.
    Bozinovski J. Bozinovski J. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Aug;164(2):478-479. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.03.095. Epub 2021 Apr 2. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022. PMID: 33933256 No abstract available.
  • Commentary: Wrap one's aorta around.
    Orozco-Sevilla V, Salerno TA. Orozco-Sevilla V, et al. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Aug;164(2):476-477. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.03.099. Epub 2021 Apr 2. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022. PMID: 33934898 No abstract available.