Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;16(4):376-383.
doi: 10.5114/aic.2020.101761. Epub 2020 Dec 29.

TransRadial versus transUlnar artery approach for elective invasive percutaneous coronary interventions: a randomized trial on the feasibility and safety with ultrasonographic outcome - RAUL study

Dagmara Gralak-Lachowska  1 , Paweł J Lewandowski  1 , Pawel Maciejewski  1 , Bogumił Ramotowski  1 , Andrzej Budaj  1 , Sebastian Stec  2
Affiliations

TransRadial versus transUlnar artery approach for elective invasive percutaneous coronary interventions: a randomized trial on the feasibility and safety with ultrasonographic outcome - RAUL study

Dagmara Gralak-Lachowska et al. Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Introduction: Transradial access (TRA) for coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is superior to transfemoral access (TFA). Transulnar access (TUA) is an alternative to TRA.

Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety of TRA vs. TUA in patients scheduled for CAG or PCI.

Material and methods: This was a prospective, single-center, randomized study conducted between 2013 and 2016. Two hundred patients referred for the first elective CAG were included in the study. Eligible patients were then randomly assigned to the TRA or TUA group. Before and after the invasive procedure, all patients underwent ultrasonographic measurements of the right upper limb arteries.

Results: The primary endpoint was efficacy, defined as a successful CAG without a crossover of vascular access. The secondary endpoint was safety, assessed as the number of vascular complications. Successful coronary angiography via the access site was 95% vs. 75% in the TRA vs. TUA groups, respectively (p < 0.001). It depended on the anatomy of UA and the operator experience. No differences were observed in early and late follow-up complications.

Conclusions: TRA was superior to TUA with regard to efficacy. TUA occurred a safe approach for CAG and PCI and could be used as an alternative method of forearm access.

Keywords: complications; transulnar access; ultrasonography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
TRA and TUA access and two types of hemostasis – standard compression and QuikClot. A – TUA, B – TRA, C – standard compression in TUA, D – QuikClot compression in TRA
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Agostoni P, Biondi-Zoccai GG, de Benedictis ML, et al. . Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures; systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44: 349-56. - PubMed
    1. Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J, et al. . Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet 2011; 377: 1409-20. - PubMed
    1. Pristipino C, Trani C, Nazzaro MS, et al. . Major improvement of percutaneous cardiovascular procedure outcomes with radial artery catheterisation: results from the PREVAIL study. Heart 2009; 95: 476-82. - PubMed
    1. Valgimigli M, Gagnor A, Calabro P, et al. . Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 2015; 385: 2465-76. - PubMed
    1. Li YZ, Zhou YJ, Zhao YX, et al. . Safety and efficacy of transulnar approach for coronary angiography and intervention. Chin Med J 2010; 123: 1774-9. - PubMed