The impact of the DWI-FLAIR-mismatch in the ECASS-4 trial - A post hoc analysis
- PMID: 33598555
- PMCID: PMC7856579
- DOI: 10.1177/2396987320920114
The impact of the DWI-FLAIR-mismatch in the ECASS-4 trial - A post hoc analysis
Abstract
Introduction: To investigate the impact of a mismatch between diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) on functional outcome in patients with acute stroke in a prolonged time window or unknown time of symptom onset randomized to intravenous thrombolysis or placebo.
Patients and methods: We performed a post-hoc analysis of the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study-4 (ECASS-4) trial. ECASS-4 was an investigator driven, phase 3, multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled study which randomized ischemic stroke patients presenting within 4.5 and 9h of stroke onset or unknown time-window to either rt-PA or placebo after MR-imaging. Two subgroups "no mismatch" (nMM) and "any mismatch" (aMM) were created by applying a DWI-FLAIR-mismatch criterion. We calculated frequency of nMM and aMM and performed a univariate analysis (Fisher's Test) for excellent clinical outcome (mRS 0-1) and mortality (mRS=6).
Results: MR-Imaging of n=111/119 (93.2%) patients was suitable for this analysis. DWI-FLAIR mismatch was found in 49 patients (44.1%). Proportions of mismatch nMM and aMM were comparable in treatment-groups (aMM: Placebo 46.3%, Alteplase 42.1%; p=0.70). Patients with nMM showed no benefit of rt-PA-treatment (OR (95%CI) mRS 0-1: 0.95 (0.29-3.17)). Patients with aMM showed a point estimate of the odds ratio in favour of a treatment benefit of rt-PA (mRS 0-1: OR (95%CI) 2.62 (0.68-11.1)). Mortality within 90 days was not different in patients treated with rt-PA if nMM (15.2%) or aMM (12.5%) was present.
Discussion: In this analysis no significant evidence, but subtle indication towards patients treated with rt-PA in a prolonged time window reaching an excellent clinical outcome if a DWI-FLAIR-mismatch is present on initial stroke MR-imaging.
Conclusion: A DWI-FLAIR mismatch in the region of ischemia as imaging based surrogate parameter for patient selection for i.v. rt-PA should be strongly pursued.
Keywords: DWI-FLAIR-mismatch; European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study-4; Thrombolysis; acute ischemic stroke; diffusion-weighted imaging; fluid-attenuated inversion recovery; magnetic resonance imaging.
© European Stroke Organisation 2020.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The sponsor of the trial (ECASS-4: ExTEND) is the University Hospital Heidelberg. Monitoring was done by Trial Form Support International, Sweden.
References
-
- Ma H, Campbell BCV, Parsons MW, et al.. Thrombolysis guided by perfusion imaging up to 9 hours after onset of stroke. N Engl J Med 2019; 380: 1795–1803. - PubMed
-
- Thomalla G, Simonsen CZ, Boutitie F, et al.. MRI-guided thrombolysis for stroke with unknown time of onset. N Engl J Med 2018; 379: 611–622. - PubMed
-
- Hoehn-Berlage M, Eis M, Back T, et al.. Changes of relaxation times (T1, T2) and apparent diffusion coefficient after permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion in the rat: temporal evolution, regional extent, and comparison with histology. Magn Reson Med 1995; 34: 824–834. - PubMed
-
- Thomalla G, Cheng B, Ebinger M, et al.. DWI-FLAIR mismatch for the identification of patients with acute ischaemic stroke within 4.5 h of symptom onset (PRE-FLAIR): a multicentre observational study. Lancet Neurol 2011; 10: 978–986. - PubMed
-
- Amiri H, Bluhmki E, Bendszus M, et al.. European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study-4: extending the time for thrombolysis in emergency neurological deficits ECASS-4: ExTEND. Int J Stroke 2016; 11: 260–267. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
