Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 20;40(11):2540-2555.
doi: 10.1002/sim.8916. Epub 2021 Feb 17.

Incorporating the dilution effect in group testing regression

Affiliations

Incorporating the dilution effect in group testing regression

Stefani C Mokalled et al. Stat Med. .

Abstract

When screening for infectious diseases, group testing has proven to be a cost efficient alternative to individual level testing. Cost savings are realized by testing pools of individual specimens (eg, blood, urine, saliva, and so on) rather than by testing the specimens separately. However, a common concern that arises in group testing is the so-called "dilution effect." This occurs if the signal from a positive individual's specimen is diluted past an assay's threshold of detection when it is pooled with multiple negative specimens. In this article, we propose a new statistical framework for group testing data that merges estimation and case identification, which are often treated separately in the literature. Our approach considers analyzing continuous biomarker levels (eg, antibody levels, antigen concentrations, and so on) from pooled samples to estimate both a binary regression model for the probability of disease and the biomarker distributions for cases and controls. To increase case identification accuracy, we then show how estimates of the biomarker distributions can be used to select diagnostic thresholds on a pool-by-pool basis. Our proposals are evaluated through numerical studies and are illustrated using hepatitis B virus data collected on a prison population in Ireland.

Keywords: biomarker; expectation-maximization algorithm; latent data; mixture model; pooled testing; specimen pooling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. Dorfman R. The detection of defective members of large populations. Ann Math Stat. 1943;14(4):436-440.
    1. Liu A, Liu C, Zhang Z, Albert P. Optimality of group testing in the presence of misclassification. Biometrika. 2012;99(1):245-251.
    1. Huang S, Huang M, Shedden K, Wong W. Optimal group testing designs for estimating prevalence with uncertain testing errors. J R Stat Soc Ser B. 2017;79(5):1547-1563.
    1. Kim H, Hudgens M, Dreyfuss J, Westreich D, Pilcher C. Comparison of group testing algorithms for case identification in the presence of test error. Biometrics. 2007;63(4):1152-1163.
    1. Westreich D, Hudgens M, Fiscus S, Pilcher C. Optimizing screening for acute human immunodeficiency virus infection with pooled nucleic acid amplification tests. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46(5):1785-1792.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources