Incorporating the dilution effect in group testing regression
- PMID: 33598950
- DOI: 10.1002/sim.8916
Incorporating the dilution effect in group testing regression
Abstract
When screening for infectious diseases, group testing has proven to be a cost efficient alternative to individual level testing. Cost savings are realized by testing pools of individual specimens (eg, blood, urine, saliva, and so on) rather than by testing the specimens separately. However, a common concern that arises in group testing is the so-called "dilution effect." This occurs if the signal from a positive individual's specimen is diluted past an assay's threshold of detection when it is pooled with multiple negative specimens. In this article, we propose a new statistical framework for group testing data that merges estimation and case identification, which are often treated separately in the literature. Our approach considers analyzing continuous biomarker levels (eg, antibody levels, antigen concentrations, and so on) from pooled samples to estimate both a binary regression model for the probability of disease and the biomarker distributions for cases and controls. To increase case identification accuracy, we then show how estimates of the biomarker distributions can be used to select diagnostic thresholds on a pool-by-pool basis. Our proposals are evaluated through numerical studies and are illustrated using hepatitis B virus data collected on a prison population in Ireland.
Keywords: biomarker; expectation-maximization algorithm; latent data; mixture model; pooled testing; specimen pooling.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Capturing the pool dilution effect in group testing regression: A Bayesian approach.Stat Med. 2022 Oct 15;41(23):4682-4696. doi: 10.1002/sim.9532. Epub 2022 Jul 25. Stat Med. 2022. PMID: 35879887 Free PMC article.
-
Group testing regression models with dilution submodels.Stat Med. 2017 Dec 30;36(30):4860-4872. doi: 10.1002/sim.7455. Epub 2017 Aug 30. Stat Med. 2017. PMID: 28856774 Free PMC article.
-
Group testing case identification with biomarker information.Comput Stat Data Anal. 2018 Jun;122:156-166. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2018.01.005. Epub 2018 Feb 1. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2018. PMID: 29977101 Free PMC article.
-
A general regression framework for group testing data, which incorporates pool dilution effects.Stat Med. 2015 Nov 30;34(27):3606-21. doi: 10.1002/sim.6578. Epub 2015 Jul 14. Stat Med. 2015. PMID: 26173957
-
To pool or not to pool? Guidelines for pooling samples for use in surveillance testing of infectious diseases in aquatic animals.J Fish Dis. 2019 Nov;42(11):1471-1491. doi: 10.1111/jfd.13083. J Fish Dis. 2019. PMID: 31637760
Cited by
-
Capturing the pool dilution effect in group testing regression: A Bayesian approach.Stat Med. 2022 Oct 15;41(23):4682-4696. doi: 10.1002/sim.9532. Epub 2022 Jul 25. Stat Med. 2022. PMID: 35879887 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Dorfman R. The detection of defective members of large populations. Ann Math Stat. 1943;14(4):436-440.
-
- Liu A, Liu C, Zhang Z, Albert P. Optimality of group testing in the presence of misclassification. Biometrika. 2012;99(1):245-251.
-
- Huang S, Huang M, Shedden K, Wong W. Optimal group testing designs for estimating prevalence with uncertain testing errors. J R Stat Soc Ser B. 2017;79(5):1547-1563.
-
- Kim H, Hudgens M, Dreyfuss J, Westreich D, Pilcher C. Comparison of group testing algorithms for case identification in the presence of test error. Biometrics. 2007;63(4):1152-1163.
-
- Westreich D, Hudgens M, Fiscus S, Pilcher C. Optimizing screening for acute human immunodeficiency virus infection with pooled nucleic acid amplification tests. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46(5):1785-1792.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous