Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1988 Feb 19;4(3):177-81.
doi: 10.1016/s0168-8227(88)80015-9.

An evaluation and comparison of Reflolux II and Glucometer II, two new portable reflectance meters for capillary blood glucose determination

Affiliations
Comparative Study

An evaluation and comparison of Reflolux II and Glucometer II, two new portable reflectance meters for capillary blood glucose determination

G M Schier et al. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. .

Abstract

The Reflolux II and the Glucometer II, two new battery-operated portable reflectance meters (PRMs) for blood glucose measurement have been evaluated for accuracy, precision and ease of operation. Both PRMs are pocket-size and simple to use. The calibration of the two instruments is fundamentally different, but in both cases the calibration data are provided with the reagent test strips and require minimal operator participation. The analysis time is 50 s for the Glucometer II and 120 s for the Reflolux II. The Reflolux II has a measuring range of 0.5-27.7 mmol/l, which is superior to the 2-22 mmol/l range of Glucometer II. Both PRMs had excellent correlation (r greater than 0.97) and minimal bias when compared by regression analysis to a laboratory method on capillary and whole blood samples. The precision of the Reflolux II was marginally better than the Glucometer II with coefficients of variation less than 6.57% for the Glucometer II and less than 5.21% for the Reflolux II. Neither the Reflolux II nor the Glucometer II offer significant advantages one over the other, both are adequate for their designed use, and both are distinct improvements over their predecessors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources