Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr;111(4):677-686.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.306062. Epub 2021 Feb 18.

State Preemption: An Emerging Threat to Local Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxation

Affiliations

State Preemption: An Emerging Threat to Local Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxation

Eric Crosbie et al. Am J Public Health. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

We sought to examine the strategies promoting and countering state preemption of local sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) taxes in the United States. Using Crosbie and Schmidt's tobacco preemption framework, we analyzed key tactics used by the SSB industry to achieve state preemption of local taxes identified in news sources, industry Web sites, government reports, and public documents.Starting in 2017, 4 states rejected and 4 passed laws preempting local SSB taxes. The beverage industry attempted to secure state preemption through front groups and trade associations, lobbying key policymakers, inserting preemptive language into other legislation, and issuing legal threats and challenges. The public health community's response is in the early stages of engaging in media advocacy, educating policymakers, mobilizing national collaboration, and expanding legal networks.State preemption of local SSB taxes is in the early stages but will likely scale up as local tax proposals increase. The public health community has a substantial role in proactively working to prevent preemption concurrent with health policy activity and using additional strategies successfully used in tobacco control to stop preemption diffusion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1—
FIGURE 1—
Beverage Industry Front Group Ads to Support State Preemption of Local Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes in Oregon and Washington: 2017–2018

Comment in

References

    1. Sánchez-Pimienta TG, Batis C, Lutter CK et al. Sugar-sweetened beverages are the main sources of added sugar intake in the Mexican population. J Nutr. 2016;146(9):1888S. doi: 10.3945/jn.115.220301. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andreyeva T, Long MW, Brownell KD. The impact of food prices on consumption: a systematic review of research on the price elasticity of demand for food. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(2):216–222. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.151415. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. City of Seattle. Sweetened beverage tax: supporting healthy food and child health and development. June 2018. Available at: https://www.seattle.gov/Documents/Departments/SweetenedBeverageTaxCommAd.... Accessed January 10, 2020.
    1. Colchero MA, Popkin BM, Rivera JA et al. Beverage purchases from stores in Mexico under the excise tax on sugar sweetened beverages: observational study. BMJ. 2016;352:h6704. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h6704. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Healthy Food America. Map and chart the movement. December 2, 2019. Available at: http://www.healthyfoodamerica.org/map. Accessed January 20, 2020.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources