Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Mar 8;23(3):e23703.
doi: 10.2196/23703.

A Comprehensive Overview of the COVID-19 Literature: Machine Learning-Based Bibliometric Analysis

Alaa Abd-Alrazaq  1 , Jens Schneider  1 , Borbala Mifsud  2 , Tanvir Alam  1 , Mowafa Househ  1 , Mounir Hamdi  1 , Zubair Shah  1
Affiliations
Review

A Comprehensive Overview of the COVID-19 Literature: Machine Learning-Based Bibliometric Analysis

Alaa Abd-Alrazaq et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Shortly after the emergence of COVID-19, researchers rapidly mobilized to study numerous aspects of the disease such as its evolution, clinical manifestations, effects, treatments, and vaccinations. This led to a rapid increase in the number of COVID-19-related publications. Identifying trends and areas of interest using traditional review methods (eg, scoping and systematic reviews) for such a large domain area is challenging.

Objective: We aimed to conduct an extensive bibliometric analysis to provide a comprehensive overview of the COVID-19 literature.

Methods: We used the COVID-19 Open Research Dataset (CORD-19) that consists of a large number of research articles related to all coronaviruses. We used a machine learning-based method to analyze the most relevant COVID-19-related articles and extracted the most prominent topics. Specifically, we used a clustering algorithm to group published articles based on the similarity of their abstracts to identify research hotspots and current research directions. We have made our software accessible to the community via GitHub.

Results: Of the 196,630 publications retrieved from the database, we included 28,904 in our analysis. The mean number of weekly publications was 990 (SD 789.3). The country that published the highest number of COVID-19-related articles was China (2950/17,270, 17.08%). The highest number of articles were published in bioRxiv. Lei Liu affiliated with the Southern University of Science and Technology in China published the highest number of articles (n=46). Based on titles and abstracts alone, we were able to identify 1515 surveys, 733 systematic reviews, 512 cohort studies, 480 meta-analyses, and 362 randomized control trials. We identified 19 different topics covered among the publications reviewed. The most dominant topic was public health response, followed by clinical care practices during the COVID-19 pandemic, clinical characteristics and risk factors, and epidemic models for its spread.

Conclusions: We provide an overview of the COVID-19 literature and have identified current hotspots and research directions. Our findings can be useful for the research community to help prioritize research needs and recognize leading COVID-19 researchers, institutes, countries, and publishers. Our study shows that an AI-based bibliometric analysis has the potential to rapidly explore a large corpus of academic publications during a public health crisis. We believe that this work can be used to analyze other eHealth-related literature to help clinicians, administrators, and policy makers to obtain a holistic view of the literature and be able to categorize different topics of the existing research for further analyses. It can be further scaled (for instance, in time) to clinical summary documentation. Publishers should avoid noise in the data by developing a way to trace the evolution of individual publications and unique authors.

Keywords: 2019-nCoV; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; bibliometric analysis; literature; machine learning; novel coronavirus disease; research; review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the selection of published articles. CORD-19: COVID-19 Open Research Dataset.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number of publications in each week (2020).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. World Health Organization. Geneva, Switzerland: 2020. Jan 21, [2020-07-19]. Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Situation Report-1. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/2....
    1. Chen Y, Li L. SARS-CoV-2: virus dynamics and host response. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 May;20(5):515–516. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30235-8. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32213336 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fontanarosa PB, Bauchner H. COVID-19--looking beyond tomorrow for health care and society. JAMA. 2020 May 19;323(19):1907–1908. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6582. - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Geneva, Switzerland: 2020. [2020-08-20]. WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard. https://covid19.who.int/
    1. Yang P, Wang X. COVID-19: a new challenge for human beings. Cell Mol Immunol. 2020 May 31;17(5):555–557. doi: 10.1038/s41423-020-0407-x. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32235915 - DOI - PMC - PubMed