"I'll tell you what's important to me…": lessons for women's health screening
- PMID: 33602189
- PMCID: PMC7891163
- DOI: 10.1186/s12905-021-01220-9
"I'll tell you what's important to me…": lessons for women's health screening
Abstract
Background: Providers face increasing demands to screen for various health issues. Family medicine, primary care, and obstetric providers are encouraged to screen women universally for intimate partner violence, which could be challenging without comprehensive screening tools. The screening expectations and demands motivated providers and staff in south-central Appalachia (U.S.) to engage community members in streamlining women's health screening tools, and integrating intimate partner violence screening questions, through a Human-Centered Design (HCD) process. The objective of this article is to present participants' experiences with and perceptions of the HCD process for developing screening tools for women's health.
Methods: This was a qualitative, phenomenological study conducted with community members (n = 4) and providers and staff (n = 7) who participated in the HCD process. Sampling was purposive and opportunistic. An experienced qualitative researcher conducted open-ended, semi-structured interviews with participants. Interviews were transcribed and coded for thematic analysis.
Results: Community members reported that in the HCD sessions they wanted clinicians to understand the importance of timing and trust in health screening. They focused on the importance of taking time to build trust before asking about intimate partner violence; not over-focusing on body weight as this can preclude trust and disclosure of other issues; and understanding the role of historical oppression and racial discrimination in contributing to healthcare mistrust. Providers and staff reported that they recognized the importance of these concerns during the HCD process.
Conclusions: Community members provided critical feedback for designing appropriate tools for screening for women's health. The findings suggest that co-designing screening tools for use in clinical settings can facilitate communication of core values. How, when, and how often screening questions are asked are as important as what is asked-especially as related to intimate partner violence and weight.
Keywords: Appalachia; Community engagement; Human-centered design; Qualitative interviews; Screening; United States; Women’s health.
Conflict of interest statement
The author declares no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Human-Centered Design for a Women's Health Screening Tool: Participant Experiences.South Med J. 2020 Oct;113(10):469-474. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001157. South Med J. 2020. PMID: 33005959
-
'They aren't really black fellas but they are easy to talk to': Factors which influence Australian Aboriginal women's decision to disclose intimate partner violence during pregnancy.Midwifery. 2016 Oct;41:79-88. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.08.004. Epub 2016 Aug 6. Midwifery. 2016. PMID: 27551857
-
Primary Care Women's Health Screening: A Case Study of a Community Engaged Human Centered Design Approach to Enhancing the Screening Process.Matern Child Health J. 2019 Nov;23(11):1446-1458. doi: 10.1007/s10995-019-02802-8. Matern Child Health J. 2019. PMID: 31250241
-
Intimate Partner Violence: What Health Care Providers Should Know.Nurs Clin North Am. 2018 Jun;53(2):177-188. doi: 10.1016/j.cnur.2018.01.007. Epub 2018 Apr 7. Nurs Clin North Am. 2018. PMID: 29779512 Review.
-
Effectiveness of ICT-based intimate partner violence interventions: a systematic review.BMC Public Health. 2020 Sep 7;20(1):1372. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09408-8. BMC Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32894115 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Development and validation of the Informal Supporter Readiness Inventory (ISRI).PLoS One. 2024 Mar 11;19(3):e0296770. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296770. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38466646 Free PMC article.
-
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025. PMID: 40110911
-
A call for action: Need to expand the scope of women's health assessment.J Adv Nurs. 2024 Feb;80(2):407-409. doi: 10.1111/jan.15788. Epub 2023 Jul 7. J Adv Nurs. 2024. PMID: 37417527 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Frayne DJ, Verbiest S, Chelmow D, Clarke H, Dunlop A, Hosmer J, et al. Health care system measures to advance preconception wellness: consensus recommendations of the clinical workgroup of the National Preconception Health and Health Care Initiative. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127(5):863–872. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001379. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Kuzawa CW, Gravlee CC. Beyond genetic race: biocultural insights into the causes of racial health disparities. New Dir Biocultural Anthropol. 2016 doi: 10.1002/9781118962954.ch5. - DOI
-
- Ostrach B. Invited brief: quality reproductive care depends on understanding how inequality exacerbates multiple health problems. Scholars Strategy Network; 2017. http://www.scholarsstrategynetwork.org/sites/default/files/ssn-key-findi....
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical