Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2021 Apr 20;59(5):e02890-20.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.02890-20. Print 2021 Apr 20.

Assessment of S1-, S2-, and NCP-Specific IgM, IgA, and IgG Antibody Kinetics in Acute SARS-CoV-2 Infection by a Microarray and Twelve Other Immunoassays

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Assessment of S1-, S2-, and NCP-Specific IgM, IgA, and IgG Antibody Kinetics in Acute SARS-CoV-2 Infection by a Microarray and Twelve Other Immunoassays

Georg Semmler et al. J Clin Microbiol. .

Abstract

In this study, we comprehensively analyzed multispecific antibody kinetics of different immunoglobulins in hospitalized patients with acute severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Three hundred fifty-four blood samples longitudinally obtained from 81 IgG-seroconverting progressed coronavirus disease 2019 (CoVID-19) patients were quantified for spike 1 (S1), S2, and nucleocapsid protein (NCP)-specific IgM, IgA, IgG, and total Ig antibodies using a microarray, 11 different enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs)/chemiluminescence immunoassays (CLIAs), and 1 rapid test by seven manufacturers. The assays' specificity was assessed in 130 non-CoVID-19 pneumonia patients. Using the microarray, NCP-specific IgA and IgG antibodies continuously displayed higher detection rates during acute CoVID-19 than S1- and S2-specific ones. S1-specific IgG antibodies, however, reached higher peak values. Until the 26th day post-symptom onset, all patients developed IgG responses against S1, S2, and NCP. Although detection rates by ELISAs/CLIAs generally resembled those of the microarray, corresponding to the target antigen, sensitivities and specificities varied among all tests. Notably, patients with more severe CoVID-19 displayed higher IgG and IgA levels, but this difference was mainly observed with S1-specific immunoassays. In patients with high SARS-CoV-2 levels in the lower respiratory tract, we observed high detection rates of IgG and total Ig immunoassays with a particular rise of S1-specific IgG antibodies when viral concentrations in the tracheal aspirate subsequently declined over time. In summary, our study demonstrates that differences in sensitivity among commercial immunoassays during acute SARS-CoV-2 infection are only partly related to the target antigen. Importantly, our data indicate that NCP-specific IgA and IgG antibodies are detected earlier, while higher S1-specific IgA antibody levels occur in severely ill patients.

Keywords: ELISA; IgA; SARS; SARS-CoV-2; antibodies; coronavirus; immunoassay; microarray.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Comparison of the assays’ specificity in 130 hospitalized patients with pneumonia without SARS-CoV-2 infection. The assays’ specificity is given as true-negativity rate, counting borderline results as negative.
FIG 2
FIG 2
Detection rates by a commercial microarray (Viramed) in 354 blood samples longitudinally obtained from 81 hospitalized IgG-seroconverting patients with acute SARS-CoV-2 infection, grouped by a 2-day interval (one sample per patient per interval step). (A) S1-, S2-, and NCP-specific IgM antibodies; (B) S1-, S2-, and NCP-specific IgA antibodies; (C) S1-, S2-, and NCP-specific IgG antibodies.
FIG 3
FIG 3
(A) Cumulative microarray (Viramed) detection rates of IgG antibodies in 354 blood samples longitudinally obtained from 81 hospitalized patients with acute SARS-CoV-2 infection, grouped by a 2-day interval (one sample per patient per interval step). (B) Percentage of hospitalized patients with acute SARS-CoV-2 infection with detectable IgG responses (microarray, Viramed) against no, one, two, or all three target antigens (S1, S2, and NCP).
FIG 4
FIG 4
Detection rates by 10 commercial immunoassays (6 ELISAs, 3 CLIAs, one rapid test; all with a specificity >80%) in the 354 blood samples from 81 hospitalized IgG-seroconverting patients with acute SARS-CoV-2 infection, grouped by a 2-day interval (one sample per patient per interval step). (A) IgM ELISAs; (B) IgA ELISA; (C) IgG ELISAs/CLIAs; (D) total Ig ELISAs/CLIAs and rapid tests. Borderline results were counted as negative.
FIG 5
FIG 5
Dynamics of median SARS-CoV-2 RNA concentration in tracheal aspirate samples (black line) and median antibody levels in 20 patients with critical CoVID-19 disease (of whom 9 patients deceased). Kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 S1-, S2-, and NCP-specific IgM (A), IgA (B), and IgG (C) antibodies as quantified by the microarray. Antibody levels as assessed by the anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgA (D), total Ig (E), and IgG ELISAs/CLIAs (F). Error bars indicate the interquartile range.
FIG 6
FIG 6
PCR and immunoassay results from 12 SARS-CoV-2-infected patients of the whole cohort who developed pneumonia and then displayed a negative PCR result from a nasopharyngeal swab (results from the initial day the nasopharyngeal swab tested negative; median, 20th day post-symptom onset; range, days 9 to 31). (A) Virus concentration by quantitative PCR in nasopharyngeal swab and tracheal aspirate samples; (B) microarray results (detection rates); (C) ELISA/CLIA results (detection rates); (D) results from the rapid test (detection rate).
FIG 7
FIG 7
Longitudinal median levels of IgA, IgG, and total Ig antibodies directed against S1 (A) and NCP (B) among the hospitalized patients with mild (n = 3) or moderate (n = 37) disease severity and patients who displayed severe (n = 11) or critical (n = 11) courses of CoVID-19 or deceased (n = 19).

References

    1. Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J, Zhao X, Huang B, Shi W, Lu R, Niu P, Zhan F, Ma X, Wang D, Xu W, Wu G, Gao GF, Tan W, China Novel Coronavirus Investigating and Research Team . 2020. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med 382:727–733. 10.1056/NEJMoa2001017. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eurosurveillance Editorial Team. 2020. Note from the editors: World Health Organization declares novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) sixth public health emergency of international concern. Euro Surveill 25:200131e. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.5.200131e. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Corman VM, Landt O, Kaiser M, Molenkamp R, Meijer A, Chu DKW, Bleicker T, Brunink S, Schneider J, Schmidt ML, Mulders D, Haagmans BL, van der Veer B, van den Brink S, Wijsman L, Goderski G, Romette JL, Ellis J, Zambon M, Peiris M, Goossens H, Reusken C, Koopmans MPG, Drosten C. 2020. Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR. Euro Surveill 25:2000045. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhao J, Yuan Q, Wang H, Liu W, Liao X, Su Y, Wang X, Yuan J, Li T, Li J, Qian S, Hong C, Wang F, Liu Y, Wang Z, He Q, Li Z, He B, Zhang T, Fu Y, Ge S, Liu L, Zhang J, Xia N, Zhang Z. 2020. Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients of novel coronavirus disease 2019. Clin Infect Dis 71:2027–2034. 10.1093/cid/ciaa344. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang H, Ai J, Loeffelholz MJ, Tang YW, Zhang W. 2020. Meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of serology tests for COVID-19: impact of assay design and post-symptom-onset intervals. Emerg Microbes Infect 9:2200–2211. 10.1080/22221751.2020.1826362. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources