Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul 31;37(1):179-209.
doi: 10.1007/s10680-020-09565-x. eCollection 2021 Mar.

A Good Age to Marry? An Intergenerational Model of the Influence of Timing Attitudes on Entrance into Marriage

Affiliations

A Good Age to Marry? An Intergenerational Model of the Influence of Timing Attitudes on Entrance into Marriage

Keera Allendorf et al. Eur J Popul. .

Abstract

Do timing attitudes-subjective evaluations of particular ages as good ages to marry-influence entrance into marriage? To address this question, we formulated an intergenerational model of how parents' and children's timing attitudes influence children's marriage behavior. We theorized that both parents' and children's timing attitudes influence expectations of when children will marry. In turn, both parents' and children's marital expectations would influence children's actual entrance into marriage. We tested the model using intergenerational panel data from Nepal collected in 2008-2014. Timing attitudes of young people and their parents did influence expectations, as well as entrance into marriage. Young people's own attitudes were more influential than their parents' attitudes in determining children's expectations, but not behavior. Further, while the influence of parents was relatively even, mothers appear slightly more influential than fathers.

Keywords: Age at marriage; Asia; Attitudes; Ideal age; Intergenerational; Marriage; Nepal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Conceptual model of how timing attitudes influence marriage behavior

References

    1. Addo FR. Debt, cohabitation, and marriage in young adulthood. Demography. 2014;51(5):1677–1701. doi: 10.1007/s13524-014-0333-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahearn LA. Invitations to love: Literacy, love letters and social change in Nepal. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press; 2001.
    1. Allendorf K. Schemas of marital change: From arranged marriages to eloping for love. Journal of Marriage and Family. 2013;75(2):453–469. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12003. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allendorf K. Conflict and compatibility? Developmental idealism and gendered differences in marital choice. Journal of Marriage and Family. 2017;79(2):337–355. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12339. - DOI
    1. Allendorf K, Pandian RK. The decline of arranged marriage? Marital change and continuity in India. Population and Development Review. 2016;42(3):435–464. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2016.00149.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources