Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jun;14(2):60-67.
doi: 10.18502/jfrh.v14i2.4354.

The Economic Burden of Abortion and Its Complication Treatment Cares: A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

The Economic Burden of Abortion and Its Complication Treatment Cares: A Systematic Review

Maryam Soleimani Movahed et al. J Family Reprod Health. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: Abortion related procedures contribute to a significant economic burden because it resulted in prolonged hospital stays for patients. We aimed to gather available evidence on the economic burden of abortion and post-abortion complication treatment cares worldwide. Materials and methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase databases were searched through November 2019. Two researchers independently conducted the quality assessment and data extraction process. The latest web-based tool adjusted the estimates of costs expressed in one specific currency and price year into a specific target currency (the year 2016 $US). Results: Totally, 2082 records were retrieved and 32 studies were deemed eligible for qualitative synthesis. The mean total costs per patient with abortion or post-abortion care ranged from $23 to $564. The annual costs ranged from 189,000 $US to 134 million $US. Conclusion: Abortion and post-abortion care impose a substantial economic burden on society. Understanding the burdensome of abortion or pregnancy termination among policymakers provides vital information and enables informed decisions to be made to establish health care priorities and allocating scarce resources.

Keywords: Abortion; Cost of Illness; Economic Burden of Disease; Miscarriage; Review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Electronic search and screen out strategy using PRISMA 2009 flow diagram.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cahill N, Sonneveldt E, Stover J, Weinberger M, Williamson J, Wei C, et al. A Probabilistic Assessment of Trends in Modern Contraceptive Prevalence, Unmet Need for and Demand Satisfied with Modern methods in the Countries of the FP2020 initiative 2018
    1. Wulf D. Sharing responsibility: women society and abortion worldwide. New York: The Alan Guttmacher Institute; 1999.
    1. Gerdts C, Tunçalp O, Johnston H, Ganatra B. Measuring abortion-related mortality: challenges and opportunities. Reprod Health. 2015;12:87. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vlassoff M, Shearer J, Walker D, Lucas H. Economic impact of unsafe abortion-related morbidity and mortality: evidence and estimation challenges. UK: Institute of Development Studies BrightonBN1 9RE; 2008.
    1. Calhoun BC. Book Review: Complications: Abortion’s Impact on Women. Linacre Q. 2018;85:178–9.

LinkOut - more resources