Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Mar;21(3):287.
doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.9718. Epub 2021 Jan 26.

Thrombotic risk in antiphospholipidic syndrome: From hypothesis to current evidence (Review)

Affiliations
Review

Thrombotic risk in antiphospholipidic syndrome: From hypothesis to current evidence (Review)

Claudia Mihaela Gavriș et al. Exp Ther Med. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Thirty-five years after it was first described, antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is unanimously recognized as a systemic autoimmune disease, a major acquired thrombophilia, which can affect any arterial or venous vascular territory, explaining the great diversity of clinical manifestations. The current classification criteria updated in the International Consensus Statement for Definite Antiphospholipid Syndrome from Sydney cannot explain alone the unpredictable evolution with thrombotic events of the patients diagnosed with APS. Although the link to genetics and epigenetics has not been clearly defined as in other autoimmune diseases, it is clear that a proper stratification of thrombotic risk in the era of personalized medicine must include classic biological markers (antiphospholipid antibodies, aPL), along with the already recognized phenotypes, non-conventional serological markers, and additional genetic risk factors for thrombosis. Moreover, with advancing age, a patient with APS develops other thrombotic risk factors which include: hypertension and dyslipidemia among others. According to the classification criteria, a patient is considered to have a low, moderate or high thrombotic risk. In clinical practice, patients with the same risk score may have completely different evolutions in terms of the recurrence of thrombosis. Concerning this approach, it appears that new non-conventional serological markers, phenotype-assessment and genetic determinants have an increasing importance and should be reconsidered in a proper thrombotic risk evaluation in patients with APS, compared to the initial concept of APS as first defined.

Keywords: anti-β2 glycoprotein-1 antibodies; anticardiolipin antibodies; antiphospholipid antibodies; antiphospholipid syndrome; lupus anticoagulant; risk assessment; thrombosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Miyakis S, Lockshin MD, Atsumi T, Branch DW, Brey RL, Cervera R, Derksen RH, DE Groot PG, Koike T, Meroni PL, et al. International consensus statement on an update of the classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) J Thromb Haemost. 2006;4:295–306. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2006.01753.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gardiner C, Hills J, Machin SJ, Cohen H. Diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome in routine clinical practice. Lupus. 2013;22:18–25. doi: 10.1177/0961203312460722. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Galli M, Reber G, de Moerloose P, de Groot PG. Invitation to a debate on the serological criteria that define the antiphospholipid syndrome. J Thromb Haemost. 2008;6:399–401. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02862.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tincani A, Andreoli L, Casu C, Cattaneo R, Meroni P. Antiphospholipid antibody profile: Implications for the evaluation and management of patients. Lupus. 2010;19:432–435. doi: 10.1177/0961203310361491. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kelchtermans H, Pelkmans L, de Laat B, Devreese KM. IgG/IgM antiphospholipid antibodies present in the classification criteria for the antiphospholipid syndrome: A critical review of their association with thrombosis. J Thromb Haemost. 2016;14:1530–1548. doi: 10.1111/jth.13379. - DOI - PubMed