Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2020 Dec;15(4):503-512.
doi: 10.26574/maedica.2020.15.4.503.

Evaluation of Medicine Exposure During Pregnancy at a Tertiary Center of an Indian State

Affiliations
Editorial

Evaluation of Medicine Exposure During Pregnancy at a Tertiary Center of an Indian State

Manoj Kumar Saurabh et al. Maedica (Bucur). 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Context:Prescribing drugs in pregnancy is a challenging approach for doctors. Objective:To evaluate drugs used in pregnancy. Method:A prospective, cross-sectional, descriptive study was carried out by collecting and evaluating prescriptions on various parameters. Results:More than 50% of antenatal care attendees belonged to the 18-24 age group, and 102 (41.46%) were primigravidae. The main presenting complaints were abdominal pain (25.16%), followed by nausea and vomiting (22.60%) and fever (11.14%); the maximum number of visits to hospital was seen in the first trimester (40.53%), followed by the third trimester (38.42%). It was observed that 25.78% of prescriptions did not contain any medicine. The average number of prescribed medicines was 2.32, with the lowest in the first trimester (1.77) and the highest in the second trimester (2.78). It was noticed that 74.11% and 71.26% of all prescribed medicines were from essential medicine list and generics, respectively. Of all prescribed drugs, 11.52% were antimicrobials, and 4.11% injectable dosage forms. Vitamins and minerals were the preferred prescribed medicines (34.82%), followed by antimicrobial agents (11.52%) and doxylamine plus pyridoxine (10.16%). Also, doctors who made the drug choice during antenatal visits were more confident in evidence-based safety as per New Pregnancy and Lactation Rule (PPLR); 45.37% of drugs were prescribed from category A, followed by 38.25% from category B and none from group X. Conclusion:Doctors were concerned about prescribing safer drugs in pregnancy and were more confident in evidence-based medication.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

TABLE 1.
TABLE 1.
Demographic profile of antenatal care attendees
TABLE 2.
TABLE 2.
Reason for visiting antinatal care (ANC)
TABLE 3.
TABLE 3.
Prescribing pattern and frequency of visits to hospital
TABLE 4.
TABLE 4.
Drug prescribed during pregnancy
TABLE 5.
TABLE 5.
Pregnancy categories as per Food Drug Administration (FDA), non-FDA and PPLR
TABLE 6.
TABLE 6.
Unprescribed drugs and remedies taken by pregnant women
ANNEX 1.
ANNEX 1.
Case record form
ANNEX 2.
ANNEX 2.
Prescribing indicator form

Similar articles

References

    1. Locktich G. Clinical biochemistry of pregnancy. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 1997;34:6. - PubMed
    1. Yankowitz J, Niebyl JR, editors. Drug therapy in pregnancy. 3rd ed. Philadelphia Lippincott William Wilkins. 2001.
    1. Sharma R, Kapoor B, Verma U. Drug utilization pattern during pregnancy in North India. J Med Sci. 2006;60:277–287. - PubMed
    1. Porter RS, editor. The Merck Manuals. Online Medical Library. Whitehouse Station: Merck Research Lab. 2004.
    1. Eze UI, Eferakeya AE, Oparah AC, Enato EF. Assessment of prescription profile of pregnant women visiting antenatal clinics. Pharmacy Practice. 2007;3:135–139. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources