Management of an Intrauterine Device Migration Resulting in a Pregnancy - Clinical Case
- PMID: 33603916
- PMCID: PMC7879363
- DOI: 10.26574/maedica.2020.15.4.549
Management of an Intrauterine Device Migration Resulting in a Pregnancy - Clinical Case
Abstract
Intrauterine devices (IUD) are one of the most commonly used methods of contraception worldwide. The long term effect makes it desirable by most patients. The insertion of an IUD is not difficult as a technique but it involves multiple complications such as uterine perforation and migration into the abdominal cavity, urinary bladder perforation, fistula formation, bowel perforation and intra-abdominal adhesions. We present the case of a 31-year-old female patient (para=4) with a medical history of an IUD insertion during her postpartum period in February 2018. In April 2019, during her normal follow up consultation, the speculum examination did not detect any IUD strings and the abdominopelvic ultrasound showed no signs of the device inside the uterine cavity. A subsequent X-ray identified the device in a horizontal position in the pelvic region. The patient was scheduled for surgical intervention, but in the meantime she became pregnant. Decision to continue with the pregnancy was taken and surgery was delayed until the postpartum period. In August 2020, a laparoscopic surgical procedure was performed; during the intervention, the IUD was identified in the anterior rectal wall with only the strings exiting the wall. Therefore, a visceral surgeon advice was required. The device was removed by continuing the laparoscopic intervention. The patient was given antibiotic treatment and had a favorable evolution. Although IUD is thought to be an easy and accessible method of contraception, complications such as uterine perforation must always be taken in consideration and well explained to all patients.
Similar articles
-
Colocolic fistula caused by a previously inserted intrauterine device. Case report.Contraception. 1997 Nov;56(5):337-9. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(97)00161-3. Contraception. 1997. PMID: 9437564
-
Retained Intrauterine Device (IUD): Triple Case Report and Review of the Literature.Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec 5;2018:9362962. doi: 10.1155/2018/9362962. eCollection 2018. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 30627466 Free PMC article.
-
Management of the missing intrauterine contraceptive device: report of a case.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Sep 15;153(2):228-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(85)90122-x. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985. PMID: 3898848
-
Ileal penetration by a Multiload-Cu 375 intrauterine contraceptive device. A case report with review of the literature.Contraception. 1998 Nov;58(5):295-304. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(98)00116-4. Contraception. 1998. PMID: 9883385 Review.
-
Complete and partial uterine perforation and embedding following insertion of intrauterine devices. II. Diagnostic methods, prevention, and management.Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1981 Aug;36(8):401-17. doi: 10.1097/00006254-198108000-00001. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1981. PMID: 6455610 Review.
Cited by
-
The Migration of an Intrauterine Device in the Bladder of an Asymptomatic Woman: A Case Report.J Reprod Infertil. 2024 Jul-Sep;25(3):238-241. doi: 10.18502/jri.v25i3.17019. J Reprod Infertil. 2024. PMID: 39830318 Free PMC article.
-
Cystoscopic Management of the Intravesical Migration of an Intrauterine Device Complicated by Bladder Stone Formation: A Video Case Report.Cureus. 2024 Jun 16;16(6):e62467. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62467. eCollection 2024 Jun. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39022456 Free PMC article.
-
Intrauterine device migration into the bladder leading to stones formation.BMJ Case Rep. 2023 Oct 24;16(10):e256547. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2023-256547. BMJ Case Rep. 2023. PMID: 37879705
-
Intraperitoneal migration of an intrauterine device: a case report.J Surg Case Rep. 2025 Jul 28;2025(7):rjaf579. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjaf579. eCollection 2025 Jul. J Surg Case Rep. 2025. PMID: 40727069 Free PMC article.
-
Ectopic Intrauterine Device Revealed by Ureteral Colic in a 37-Week Pregnant Woman: Case Report.Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jun 8;10(6):1060. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10061060. Healthcare (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35742111 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Arslan A, Kanat-Pektas M, Yesilyurt H, et al. Colon penetration by a copper intrauterine device: a case report with literature review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009;279:395–397. - PubMed
-
- Inceboz US, Ozcakir HT, Uyar Y, et al. Migration of an intrauterine contraceptive device to the sigmoid colon: a case report. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2003;8:229–232. - PubMed
-
- Black A, Guilbert E, Costescu D, et al. Canadian contraception consensus (part 3 of 4): Intrauterine contraception. J Obstet Gynecol Can. 2018;329:182–222. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous