Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 9;11(2):jkab005.
doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkab005.

Treatment of the X chromosome in mapping multiple quantitative trait loci

Affiliations

Treatment of the X chromosome in mapping multiple quantitative trait loci

Quoc Tran et al. G3 (Bethesda). .

Abstract

Statistical methods to map quantitative trait loci (QTL) often neglect the X chromosome and may focus exclusively on autosomal loci. But the X chromosome often requires special treatment: sex and cross-direction covariates may need to be included to avoid spurious evidence of linkage, and the X chromosome may require a separate significance threshold. In multiple-QTL analyses, including the consideration of epistatic interactions, the X chromosome also requires special care and consideration. We extend a penalized likelihood method for multiple-QTL model selection, to appropriately handle the X chromosome. We examine its performance in simulation and by application to a large eQTL data set. The method has been implemented in the package R/qtl.

Keywords: QTL; X chromosome; model selection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Simulation results: Type I error and power of these methods across simulated models. Black is the method treating the X chromosome and autosomes the same (XeqA); green is the method treating the X chromosome and autosomes differently (XneA). The estimates and 95% confidence intervals are based on 1,000 simulations. (A) Type I error for main effects. (B) log2 ratio of the Type I error of main effects for autosomes versus the X chromosome. (C) Type I error for interactions. (D) Power to detect QTL.
Figure 2
Figure 2
LOD profile of output models from XeqA (black) and XneA (green) methods on probe 10003837305. Note that there are two black curves on chromosome 7, because the XeqA method identified two QTL on that chromosome.

Similar articles

References

    1. Broman KW, Sen Ś.. 2009. A Guide to QTL Mapping with R/qtl. New York, NY: Springer. ISBN 978-0-387-92124-2.
    1. Broman KW, Sen Ś, Owens SE, Manichaikul A, Southard-Smith EM, et al.2006. The X chromosome in quantitative trait locus mapping. Genetics. 174:2151–2158. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Broman KW, Speed TP.. 2002. A model selection approach for the identification of quantitative trait loci in experimental crosses. J Royal Stat Soc B. 64:641–656. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Broman KW, Wu H, Sen Ś, Churchill GA.. 2003. R/qtl: QTL mapping in experimental crosses. Bioinformatics. 19:889–890. - PubMed
    1. Churchill GA, Doerge RW.. 1994. Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics. 138:963–971. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources