Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021:2243:271-281.
doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1103-6_13.

Accurate Imputation of Untyped Variants from Deep Sequencing Data

Affiliations
Review

Accurate Imputation of Untyped Variants from Deep Sequencing Data

Davoud Torkamaneh et al. Methods Mol Biol. 2021.

Abstract

The quality, statistical power, and resolution of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are largely dependent on the comprehensiveness of genotypic data. Over the last few years, despite the constant decrease in the price of sequencing, whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of association panels comprising a large number of samples remains cost-prohibitive. Therefore, most GWAS populations are still genotyped using low-coverage genotyping methods resulting in incomplete datasets. Imputation of untyped variants is a powerful method to maximize the number of SNPs identified in study samples, it increases the power and resolution of GWAS and allows to integrate genotyping datasets obtained from various sources. Here, we describe the key concepts underlying imputation of untyped variants, including the architecture of reference panels, and review some of the associated challenges and how these can be addressed. We also discuss the need and available methods to rigorously assess the accuracy of imputed data prior to their use in any genetic study.

Keywords: Deep sequencing; GWAS; Genotype imputation; Genotyping; Imputation; Imputation accuracy; NGS data analysis; Reference panel; Untyped variants.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Visscher PM, Wray NR, Zhang Q et al (2017) 10 years of GWAS discovery: biology, function, and translation. Am J Hum Genet 101(1):5–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.06.005 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Bush WS, Moore JH (2012) Chapter 11: genome-wide association studies. PLoS Comput Biol 8(12):e1002822. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002822 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Torkamaneh D, Boyle B, Belzile F (2018) Efficient genome-wide genotyping strategies and data integration in crop plants. Theor Appl Genet 131:499–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-018-3056-z - DOI - PubMed
    1. Huang X, Feng Q, Qian Q et al (2009) High-throughput genotyping by whole-genome resequencing. Genome Res 19(6):1068–1076. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.089516.108 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Golicz AA, Bayer PE, Edwards D (2015) Skim-based genotyping by sequencing. Methods Mol Biol 1245:257–270 - DOI

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources