Long-term Functional Outcomes and Complications in Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment for Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures in Adolescents: A Retrospective Comparative Study
- PMID: 33606445
- DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001768
Long-term Functional Outcomes and Complications in Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment for Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures in Adolescents: A Retrospective Comparative Study
Abstract
Introduction: Traditionally, midshaft clavicular fractures in adolescents are treated nonoperatively. In later years, a trend toward operative treatment can be observed. Documentation of the benefit of surgery in this group is scarce. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term patient reported functional outcomes and complications for patients treated operatively and nonoperatively for displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. Using the same outcomes we also compared the operative methods.
Methods: One hundred nine adolescents aged 12 to 18 years sustaining displaced midshaft clavicular fractures in the period 2010 to 2016 were identified in our computerized files. Sixty-one were treated nonoperatively, 48 operatively (22 plate and 26 intramedullary nail). Their radiographs and patient journals were examined for fracture classification, wound infection, sensory affection, surgery duration, hardware removal, and nonunion (n=109). Long-term function, pain, and satisfaction were measured with Quick Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH), Oxford Shoulder Score and Visual Analogue Scale (n=87).
Results: Operative treatment: We could find no difference in functional score outcomes. The main outcome QuickDASH was excellent in both groups (median 0 nail vs. 2.26 plate). Surgery duration was shorter with intramedullary nail. We found 2 infections and 2 sensory affections in the plate group, and 1 infection and 1 sensory affection in the intramedullary nail group. There were 2 refractures in the nail group. Operative versus nonoperative treatment: there were no differences in functional outcomes between the operative and nonoperative groups. For the main outcome QuickDASH both groups scored excellently (median 1.12 operative vs. 0 nonoperative). The nonoperative group was more satisfied with the cosmetic result. There was 1 nonunion in the nonoperative group that later was operated.
Conclusions: Adolescents aged 12 to 18 years with displaced midshaft clavicular fractures show good long-term functional results after plate fixation, intramedullary nail, and nonoperative treatment. No additional benefit is demonstrated for surgery in our material. Nonoperatively treated patients are more satisfied with the cosmetic results. Little difference is seen between the operative methods in our study. We conclude that surgery should rarely be the choice of treatment for displaced midshaft clavicular fractures in adolescents.
Level of evidence: Level III study-retrospective comparative study.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. Surgical technique.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Mar;90 Suppl 2 Pt 1:1-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01336. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008. PMID: 18310682 Clinical Trial.
-
Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. A multicenter, randomized clinical trial.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Jan;89(1):1-10. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00020. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007. PMID: 17200303 Clinical Trial.
-
Is There a Deficit After Nonoperative Versus Operative Treatment of Shortened Midshaft Clavicular Fractures in Adolescents?J Pediatr Orthop. 2017 Jun;37(4):227-233. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000627. J Pediatr Orthop. 2017. PMID: 26327404
-
What Is the Best Evidence for Management of Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of 22 Randomized Controlled Trials.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Feb;478(2):392-402. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000986. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020. PMID: 31574019 Free PMC article.
-
Operative Versus Nonoperative Management of Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Orthop Trauma. 2019 Nov;33(11):e439-e446. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001580. J Orthop Trauma. 2019. PMID: 31633645
Cited by
-
[Treatment of clavicle fracture: Interpretation of the 2023 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Clinical Practice Guidelines].Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Aug 15;38(8):942-946. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202404101. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024. PMID: 39175315 Free PMC article. Chinese.
-
Trends in the Treatment of Adolescent Clavicle Fractures: Are We Listening to the Evidence?J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2023 Feb 3;7(2):e22.00277. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-22-00277. eCollection 2023 Feb 1. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2023. PMID: 36745543 Free PMC article.
-
Pediatric Clavicle Fractures and Congenital Pseudarthrosis Unraveled.Children (Basel). 2022 Jan 3;9(1):49. doi: 10.3390/children9010049. Children (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35053674 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Nonoperative versus surgical treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures in adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.Int Orthop. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1007/s00264-025-06589-y. Online ahead of print. Int Orthop. 2025. PMID: 40560219 Review. No abstract available.
-
Management of Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures in Pediatrics and Adolescents: Operative vs Nonoperative Treatment.Orthop Res Rev. 2022 Nov 1;14:373-381. doi: 10.2147/ORR.S340538. eCollection 2022. Orthop Res Rev. 2022. PMID: 36345395 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Randsborg PH, Fuglesang HFS, Røtterud JH, et al. Long-term patient-reported outcome after fractures of the clavicle in patients aged 10 to 18 years. J Pediatr Orthop. 2014;34:393–399.
-
- Hedström EM, Svensson O, Bergström U, et al. Epidemiology of fractures in children and adolescents. Acta Orthop. 2010;81:148–153.
-
- Neer CS. Nonunion of the clavicle. J Am Med Assoc. 1960;172:1006–1011.
-
- Rowe CR. An atlas of anatomy and treatment of midclaviuclar fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1968;58:29–42.
-
- Kubiak R. Operative treatment of clavicle fractures in children: a review of 21 years. J Pediatr Orthop. 2002;22:736–739.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials