Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov;45(6):809-820.
doi: 10.1080/10790268.2021.1878342. Epub 2021 Feb 19.

Use and evaluation of assistive technologies for upper limb function in tetraplegia

Rosti Readioff  1 , Zaha Kamran Siddiqui  2 , Caroline Stewart  1   3 , Louisa Fulbrook  3 , Rory J O'Connor  2 , Edward K Chadwick  4
Affiliations

Use and evaluation of assistive technologies for upper limb function in tetraplegia

Rosti Readioff et al. J Spinal Cord Med. 2022 Nov.

Abstract

Context: More than half of all spinal cord injuries (SCI) occur at the cervical level leading to loss of upper limb function, restricted activity and reduced independence. Several technologies have been developed to assist with upper limb functions in the SCI population.

Objective: There is no clear clinical consensus on the effectiveness of the current assistive technologies for the cervical SCI population, hence this study reviews the literature in the years between 1999 and 2019.

Methods: A systematic review was performed on the state-of-the-art assistive technology that supports and improves the function of impaired upper limbs in cervical SCI populations. Combinations of terms, covering assistive technology, SCI, and upper limb, were used in the search, which resulted in a total of 1770 articles. Data extractions were performed on the selected studies which involved summarizing details on the assistive technologies, characteristics of study participants, outcome measures, and improved upper limb functions when using the device.

Results: A total of 24 articles were found and grouped into five categories, including neuroprostheses (invasive and non-invasive), orthotic devices, hybrid systems, robots, and arm supports. Only a few selected studies comprehensively reported characteristics of the participants. There was a wide range of outcome measures and all studies reported improvements in upper limb function with the devices.

Conclusions: This study highlighted that assistive technologies can improve functions of the upper limbs in SCI patients. It was challenging to draw generalizable conclusions because of factors, such as heterogeneity of recruited participants, a wide range of outcome measures, and the different technologies employed.

Keywords: Assistive technology; Spinal cord injury; Tetraplegia; Upper limb.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study selection flow diagram for the searched databases. Abbreviations: NP, neuroprostheses.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. NHS England . NHS standard contract for spinal cord injuries (all ages). Redditch: NHS England; 2013. p. 1–70.
    1. Barr F. Preserving and developing the national spinal cord injury service: phase 2 – seeking the evidence. Milton Keynes: Spinal Injuries Association; 2009. p. 1–32.
    1. Gall A, Turner-Stokes L.. Chronic spinal cord injury: management of patients in acute hospital settings. Clin Med (Lond). 2008 Feb;8(1):70–4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lasfargues JE, Custis D, Morrone F, Cars Well J, Nguyen T.. A model for estimating spinal cord injury prevalence in the United States. Spinal Cord 1995 Feb;33(2):62–8. - PubMed
    1. Jain NB, Ayers GD, Peterson EN, Harris MB, Morse L, O’Connor KC, et al. . Traumatic spinal cord injury in the United States, 1993–2012. JAMA 2015 Jun 9;313(22):2236–43. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types