Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1977 Sep;61(9):601-7.
doi: 10.1136/bjo.61.9.601.

A microbiological study of neonatal conjunctivae and conjunctivitis

A microbiological study of neonatal conjunctivae and conjunctivitis

M J Prentice et al. Br J Ophthalmol. 1977 Sep.

Abstract

To investigate the importance of chlamydiae, ureaplasmas, Mycoplasma hominis, and anaerobic bacteria in the pathogenesis of neonatal conjunctivitis in the Harrow population conjunctival specimens from 104 infants with conjunctivitis and 104 similar healthy neonates were examined. The incidence of neonatal conjunctivitis was 8-2%, and no case of neomycin-resistant disease occurred during the study. Staphylococcus aureus, viridans Streptococci, and Escherichia coli were the only micro-organisms isolated significantly more frequently from affected than from control eyes, which suggests that these bacteria may be a cause of the conjunctivitis. All cultures for chlamydiae, M. hominis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and anaerobic bacteria were negative. The mother's race, social status, illness, and obstetric events were found to have no effect on the incidence, time of onset of conjunctivitis, or micro-organisms isolated. The clinical characteristics of conjunctivitis were also not related to the micro-organisms isolated. No potential pathogens were isolated from 63-5% of the eyes showing conjunctivitis. The results suggest that some of these cases may be caused by chemical irritation, and the possibility of an infectious aetiology is also discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1968 Feb 1;100(3):422-31 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1965 May 29;1(7396):1125-8 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1976 Dec 11;2(7998):1276-8 - PubMed
    1. Br J Vener Dis. 1976 Aug;52(4):269-75 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J. 1968 Aug 31;3(5617):527-8 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources