Time trends in incidence and survival of small intestinal cancer in Sweden
- PMID: 33609370
- PMCID: PMC7893462
- DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa044
Time trends in incidence and survival of small intestinal cancer in Sweden
Abstract
Background: Small intestinal cancer is less common than some other gastrointestinal malignancies. Tumours of different histological types and anatomical sites of origin have therefore often been described together. The aim of this study was to investigate the epidemiology for each of the four main subtypes: duodenal adenocarcinoma (D-AC), duodenal neuroendocrine tumour (D-NET), jejunoileal adenocarcinoma (J/I-AC), and jejunoileal neuroendocrine tumour (J/I-NET).
Methods: All patients with small intestinal cancer diagnosed between 1960 and 2015 were identified from the Swedish Cancer Register. The age-adjusted incidence rate with incidence rate ratios, as well as overall (OS) and net (NS) survival, were determined and temporal trends were analysed.
Results: The incidence rate was highest for J/I-NET, with 9.98 clinical diagnoses per million in 2010-2015. Clinical diagnosis of D-AC increased more than 10-fold and surpassed J/I-AC as the second most common subtype. D-NET was by far the least common subtype. Diagnosis at autopsy became less common over time, whereas clinical diagnoses increased significantly for all four subtypes. All subtypes except J/I-AC affected men more often than women. The age distribution was similar between subtypes, although patients with adenocarcinomas were slightly older. Survival was generally much better for patients with NET than for those with adenocarcinoma. Both OS and NS showed a negative association with advancing age. Survival improved only for J/I-NET from a 5-year NS of 0.69 in the 1960s to 0.81 in 2010-2015.
Conclusion: The incidence of small intestinal cancer is increasing, particularly for D-AC and in the elderly. Survival of patients with small intestinal cancer has improved only for J/I-NET over the last decades.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd.
Figures
References
-
- Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Statistics on Cancer. https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/statistik-och-data/statistik/statistikamn... (accessed 18 May 2020)
-
- von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 2007;370:1453–1457 - PubMed
-
- Barlow L, Westergren K, Holmberg L, Talbäck M. The completeness of the Swedish Cancer Register: a sample survey for year 1998. Acta Oncol 2009;48:27–33 - PubMed
-
- Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Cancer incidence in Sweden in 2009. https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/globalassets/sharepoint-dokument/artikelk... (accessed 18 May 2020)
-
- Rindi G, Klöppel G, Alhman H, Caplin M, Couvelard A, de Herder WW et al.; all other Frascati Consensus Conference participants; European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS). TNM staging of foregut (neuro)endocrine tumors: a consensus proposal including a grading system. Virchows Arch 2006;449:395−401 - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
