Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2021 Jan 8;5(1):zraa063.
doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa063.

Patient-reported outcomes of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without biological or synthetic mesh

Affiliations
Observational Study

Patient-reported outcomes of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without biological or synthetic mesh

E Sewart et al. BJS Open. .

Abstract

Background: Biological and synthetic meshes may improve the outcomes of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) by facilitating single-stage procedures and improving cosmesis. Supporting evidence is, however, limited. The aim of this study was to explore the impact of biological and synthetic mesh on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of IBBR 18 months after surgery.

Methods: Consecutive women undergoing immediate IBBR between February 2014 and June 2016 were recruited to the study. Demographic, operative, oncological and 3-month complication data were collected, and patients received validated BREAST-Q questionnaires at 18 months. The impact of different IBBR techniques on PROs were explored using mixed-effects regression models adjusted for clinically relevant confounders, and including a random effect to account for clustering by centre.

Results: A total of 1470 participants consented to receive the questionnaire and 891 completed it. Of these, 67 women underwent two-stage submuscular reconstructions. Some 764 patients had a submuscular reconstruction with biological mesh (495 women), synthetic mesh (95) or dermal sling (174). Fourteen patients had a prepectoral reconstruction. Compared with two-stage submuscular reconstructions, no significant differences in PROs were seen in biological or synthetic mesh-assisted or dermal sling procedures. However, patients undergoing prepectoral IBBR reported better satisfaction with breasts (adjusted mean difference +6.63, 95 per cent c.i. 1.65 to11.61; P = 0.009). PROs were similar to those in the National Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction Audit 2008-2009 cohort, which included two-stage submuscular procedures only.

Conclusion: This study found no difference in PROs of subpectoral IBBR with or without biological or synthetic mesh, but provides early data to suggest improved satisfaction with breasts following prepectoral reconstruction. Robust evaluation is required before this approach can be adopted as standard practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. World Cancer Research Fund. Breast Cancer Statistics. https://www.wcrf.org/dietandcancer/cancer-trends/breast-cancer-statistics (accessed 1 June 2020)
    1. Jeevan R, Browne J, van der Meulen J, Pereira J, Caddy C, Sheppard C et al. First Annual Report of the National Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction Audit 2008. Leeds: The NHS Information Centre, 2008
    1. American Cancer Society. Breast Cancer Facts & Figures 2019–2020. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, 2019
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Early and Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: Diagnosis and Management. NICE Guidance NG101;. 2018. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng101 (accessed 13 October 2019)
    1. Harcourt D, Rumsey N. Psychological aspects of breast reconstruction: a review of the literature. J Adv Nurs 2001;35:477–87 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Associated data