The ability to screw-retain single implant-supported restorations in the anterior maxilla: A CBCT analysis
- PMID: 33610330
- DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.01.004
The ability to screw-retain single implant-supported restorations in the anterior maxilla: A CBCT analysis
Abstract
Statement of problem: Evidence to validate the routine use of angled screw-channel abutments in the anterior maxilla is sparse. If properly planned, they might provide surgical and prosthetic benefits.
Purpose: The purpose of this observational study was to determine the prevalence of digitally placed implants in the anterior maxilla that would allow screw-retained implant-supported restorations with either a straight or an angled screw-channel abutment.
Material and methods: Two hundred cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans met the inclusion criteria for retrospective analysis and digital implant planning. Virtual implants were planned for randomly selected anterior maxillary teeth by using the anatomic crown and root position. Virtual abutments of varying angulation were attached to the implants to determine the ability to screw retain a restoration with either a straight or an angled screw-channel abutment.
Results: One hundred fifty-two (76%) sites required an angled screw-channel abutment to enable screw retention. Forty-eight (24%) sites allowed screw retention with a straight abutment. The percentage of implants requiring angled or straight abutments varied significantly among anterior teeth (P<.005). One hundred nine (71.7%) angled screw-channel abutment sites required a 5-degree abutment, 41 (26.9%) required a 10-degree abutment, and 2 (1.3%) required a 15-degree abutment. Among the anterior teeth, lateral incisors presented a greater need for angled screw-channel abutments. None of the implants in the present study needed cement-retained restorations.
Conclusions: Angled abutments allowed for screw-retained restorations on digitally planned implants in the anterior maxilla. The required angular correction to a screw-retained restoration was ≤15 degrees. Screw-retained restorations were frequently achievable (76%) with the use of angled screw-channel abutments or with straight abutments (24%), and lateral incisors presented a greater need for angled screw-channel abutments.
Copyright © 2021 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Torque Maintenance of Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Anterior Fixed Dental Prosthesis with Different Abutment Angulations After Aging.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021 Jul-Aug;36(4):723-729. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8647. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021. PMID: 34411211
-
Screw loosening in angulation-correcting single implant restorations: A systematic review of in vitro studies.J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Sep;132(3):520-527. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.08.003. Epub 2022 Sep 16. J Prosthet Dent. 2024. PMID: 36116951
-
Frequency of screw-retained angulated screw channel single crown following immediate implant placement and provisionalization in the esthetic zone: A cone beam computed tomography study.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2023 Oct;25(5):789-794. doi: 10.1111/cid.13227. Epub 2023 May 26. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2023. PMID: 37232408
-
The Use of a New Safe Angle Concept for Immediate Implant Placement in the Anterior Maxilla: A Cross-Sectional CBCT Study.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2024 Jun 21;(3):77-86. doi: 10.11607/jomi.10578. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2024. PMID: 38607356
-
[Current status of implant-abutment--part 1: abutments for cemented versus screw retained restorations].Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993). 2012 Jan;29(1):19-25, 63. Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993). 2012. PMID: 22991873 Review. Hebrew.
Cited by
-
Biomechanical Analysis of Angled Abutments in the Anterior Maxilla: Impact of Bone Quality and Loading Conditions Using Finite Element Analysis.Cureus. 2025 May 18;17(5):e84329. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84329. eCollection 2025 May. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 40530220 Free PMC article.
-
Incidence of straight and angulated screw channel following immediate implant placement in esthetic zone: A simulated cone-beam computed tomography study.PLoS One. 2024 Sep 5;19(9):e0308158. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308158. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39236053 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical and Laboratory Outcomes of Angled Screw Channel Implant Prostheses: A Systematic Review.Eur J Dent. 2022 Jul;16(3):488-499. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1740298. Epub 2022 Feb 21. Eur J Dent. 2022. PMID: 35189643 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Aesthetic, Mechanical Outcome, and Bone Loss in Angulated Screw Channels (ASCs) and Cement-Retained Implant-Supported Prosthesis: A Case-Control Study.Dent J (Basel). 2024 Jul 24;12(8):233. doi: 10.3390/dj12080233. Dent J (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39195077 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical decision-making of anterior implant abutment.Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2022 Oct 1;40(5):504-512. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2022.05.002. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2022. PMID: 38596970 Free PMC article. Chinese, English.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous