Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Apr:56:42-52.
doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.02.004. Epub 2021 Feb 10.

A multidisciplinary view of mastectomy and breast reconstruction: Understanding the challenges

Affiliations
Review

A multidisciplinary view of mastectomy and breast reconstruction: Understanding the challenges

Orit Kaidar-Person et al. Breast. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

The current review paper was written in collaboration with breast cancer surgeons from the European Breast Cancer Research Association of Surgical Trialists (EUBREAST), a breast pathologist from the Danish Breast Cancer Group (DBCG), and representatives from the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) breast cancer course. Herein we summarize the different mastectomies and reconstruction procedures and define high-risk anatomical areas for breast cancer recurrences, to further specify the challenges in the surgical procedure, histopathological evaluation, and target volumes in case of postmastectomy irradiation, as recommended by the ESTRO guidelines according to the surgical procedure. The paper has original figures and illustrations for all disciplines for in-depth understanding of the differences between the procedures.

Keywords: Breast cancer; Mastectomy; Nipple sparing; Radiation; Reconstruction; Skin sparing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest None relevant for the contents of this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The 3-dimensional superficial fascia system of the mammary gland. Camper’s and Scarpa’s fascia are a thick superficial and deep layer, respectively, of the anterior abdominal wall.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
A patient who underwent Halsted’s mastectomy on the left side and modified radical mastectomy on the right. On the left, deformity from pectoral muscle removal is noted and the ribs are easily seen. The arrow on the left shows a local recurrence at the mastectomy scar, 25 years after the surgical procedure. On the right side, excess skin is noted.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
A-D: Mastectomy incision according to tumour location.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Excessive tissue causing wrinkling at the edge of a scar as a result of residual subcutaneous fat from the chest wall (Dog ears).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
A, B: (A) Bilateral Skin sparing mastectomy (SSM) with (B) nipple reconstruction, all is native skin breast. The SSM was done via horizontal elliptical skin incision, which allows for a 360° freedom to resect the breast parenchyma, at all locations. It also allows full access to the axilla.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Nipple sparing mastectomy in a peri-areolar approach.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) with a peri-areolar incision over 180°, with a radial elongation (a hockey-stick incision). It allows a direct access to the retro-areolar space and even to the medial quadrants.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Anterior plane of dissection in skin sparing and nipple sparing mastectomy, showing the subcutaneous fat. The thickness of the subcutaneous fat depends on the body mass index, but also varies according to different locations of the breast. The observation that there is a tendency to a thinner layer at the lower pole, assumed to be because of the weight of the mammary gland, explains, along with the gravitation force on the implant, why this area is more difficult to maintain the viability of the skin. Thus, the use of supportive material (such as a mesh) may be required to reducing the pressure.
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Microscopic view of the anterior resection margins of skin/nipple sparing mastectomy.
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Posterior resection border, the breast glandular tissue resected including the pectoralis major fascia. The figure shows the delicate fascia encapsulating the glandular tissue at the posterior plane and the perforating vessels.
Fig. 11
Fig. 11
A,B: The use of supportive mesh to complete the pectoralis muscle deficit at the lower pole and create a pocket to hold the subpectoral implant.
Fig. 12
Fig. 12
Skin sparing mastectomy with skin reducing procedure for mastopexy, using an inverted T incision, with preserving of autologous de-epithelialized dermal graft on the lower pole, to serve as a dermal sling. Immediate reconstruction was done using anatomical shaped silicone implant, 610 cc, placed posterior to the pectoral major muscle (sub-pectoral) which is covering the cranial pole of the implant. The infero-lateral pole is covered by partly absorbable synthetic mesh, and on top of the mesh the dermal sling. All is then covered by the native-breast skin flap adjusted from the medial and lateral sides, with a visible scar in the form of inverted “T”.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Offersen B.V., Boersma L.J., Kirkove C. ESTRO consensus guideline on target volume delineation for elective radiation therapy of early stage breast cancer, version 1.1. Radiother Oncol. 2016;118:205–208. - PubMed
    1. Marks L.B., Kaidar-Person O., Poortmans P. Regarding current recommendations for postmastectomy radiation therapy in patients with one to three positive axillary lymph nodes. J Clin Oncol. 2017 - PubMed
    1. Frasier L.L., Holden S., Holden T. Temporal trends in postmastectomy radiation therapy and breast reconstruction associated with changes in national comprehensive cancer network guidelines. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2:95–101. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ebctcg McGale P., Taylor C. Effect of radiotherapy after mastectomy and axillary surgery on 10-year recurrence and 20-year breast cancer mortality: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 8135 women in 22 randomised trials. Lancet. 2014;383:2127–2135. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Donker M., van Tienhoven G., Straver M.E. Radiotherapy or surgery of the axilla after a positive sentinel node in breast cancer (EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:1303–1310. - PMC - PubMed