Robotic versus laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA): a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 33611619
- DOI: 10.1007/s00384-021-03868-z
Robotic versus laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA): a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal-pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) is a curative and cancer preventative procedure in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). It can be technically difficult laparoscopically, and hence the robotic platform has been suggested as a way to enable minimally invasive surgery in more patients. This systematic review examines robotic proctectomy or proctocolectomy with IPAA. A limited meta-analysis was performed on data comparing the robotic approach to laparoscopy.
Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane database for case series of robotic IPAA procedures and studies comparing the robotic to laparoscopic or open procedures. Data examined includes operating time, conversion to open, length of stay, complications, blood loss, return of bowel function, reoperation rate and functional outcomes.
Results: Five non-randomised studies compared robotic to laparoscopic techniques; one compared robotic to open surgery and three case series are included. Operating time was significantly longer in robotic cases. Estimated blood loss was significantly less in three of four studies which reported this; hospital stay was significantly less in two. There were nonsignificant reductions in complications and readmission rates. Pooled analysis of four papers with adequate data showed a nonstatistically significant trend to less complications in robotic procedures. Three studies assessed functional and quality of life outcomes, with little difference between the platforms.
Conclusions: Available data suggests that the robotic platform is safe to use for IPAA procedures. There is minimal evidence for clinical advantages, but with little data to base decisions and significant potential for improvements in technique and cost-effectiveness, further use of the platform for this operation is warranted. It is vital that this occurs within an evaluation framework.
Keywords: Colorectal surgery; Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis; Restorative proctocolectomy; Robotic surgery.
Similar articles
-
Open versus laparoscopic (assisted) ileo pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21;(1):CD006267. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006267.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009. PMID: 19160273
-
Comparative analysis of robotic, laparoscopic, and open ileal pouch-anal anastomosis outcomes: retrospective cohort study.BJS Open. 2025 Jul 1;9(4):zraf084. doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraf084. BJS Open. 2025. PMID: 40742352 Free PMC article.
-
Transanal ileal pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis in children and adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Pediatr Surg Int. 2022 Dec;38(12):1671-1680. doi: 10.1007/s00383-022-05222-y. Epub 2022 Sep 17. Pediatr Surg Int. 2022. PMID: 36114863
-
National trends and outcomes of total proctocolectomy and completion proctectomy ileal pouch-anal anastomosis procedures for ulcerative colitis.Colorectal Dis. 2024 Mar;26(3):497-507. doi: 10.1111/codi.16891. Epub 2024 Feb 1. Colorectal Dis. 2024. PMID: 38302723
-
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the outcome of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis versus patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.Tech Coloproctol. 2022 Sep;26(9):691-705. doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02617-w. Epub 2022 Mar 31. Tech Coloproctol. 2022. PMID: 35357610
Cited by
-
State-of-the-art surgery for ulcerative colitis.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Sep;406(6):1751-1761. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02295-6. Epub 2021 Aug 28. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021. PMID: 34453611 Free PMC article.
-
Defining the safety of early ileostomy closure after ileal pouch anal anastomosis.Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Dec;27(12):1257-1263. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02811-4. Epub 2023 May 20. Tech Coloproctol. 2023. PMID: 37209279
-
The Impacts of Laparoscopic Restorative Proctocolectomy for Ulcerative Colitis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Inflamm Intest Dis. 2024 Mar 5;9(1):62-70. doi: 10.1159/000535832. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec. Inflamm Intest Dis. 2024. PMID: 38544522 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Open vs. laparoscopic vs. robotic pouch excision: unveiling the best approach for optimal outcomes.Tech Coloproctol. 2024 Oct 15;28(1):142. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-02999-z. Tech Coloproctol. 2024. PMID: 39404860
-
Outcomes of robotic surgery for inflammatory bowel disease using the Medtronic Hugo™ Robotic-Assisted Surgical platform: a single center experience.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 Oct 10;39(1):158. doi: 10.1007/s00384-024-04736-2. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024. PMID: 39384631 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ng KS, Gonsalves SJ, Sagar PM (2019) Ileal-anal pouches: a review of its history, indications, and complications. World J Gastroenterol 25(31):4320–4342. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i31.4320 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Singh P, Bhangu A, Nicholls RJ, Tekkis P (2013) A systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic vs open restorative proctocolectomy. Color Dis 15(7):e340–e351. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.12231 - DOI
-
- Larson DW, Cima RR, Dozois EJ, Davies M, Piotrowicz K, Barnes SA, Wolff B, Pemberton J (2006) Safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic ileal-pouch-anal anastomosis: a single institutional case-matched experience. Ann Surg 243(5):667–670; discussion 670-662. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000216762.83407.d2 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- White I, Jenkins JT, Coomber R, Clark SK, Phillips RK, Kennedy RH (2014) Outcomes of laparoscopic and open restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 101(9):1160–1165. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9535 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Bartels SA, D'Hoore A, Cuesta MA, Bensdorp AJ, Lucas C, Bemelman WA (2012) Significantly increased pregnancy rates after laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: a cross-sectional study. Ann Surg 256(6):1045–1048. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318250caa9 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous