Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022;41(1):197-227.
doi: 10.1007/s11113-021-09640-z. Epub 2021 Feb 15.

Care Life Expectancy: Gender and Unpaid Work in the Context of Population Aging

Affiliations

Care Life Expectancy: Gender and Unpaid Work in the Context of Population Aging

Ariane Ophir et al. Popul Res Policy Rev. 2022.

Abstract

Amid growing concern regarding the potential added burden of care due to population aging, we have very little understanding of what is the burden of care in aging populations. To answer this question, we introduce a novel metric that encompasses demographic complexity and social context to summarize unpaid family care work provided to children, elderly, and other family members across the life cycle at a population level. The measure (Care Life Expectancy), an application of the Sullivan method, estimates the number of years and proportion of adult life that people spend in an unpaid caregiving role. We demonstrate the value of the metric by using it to describe gender differences in unpaid care work in 23 European aging countries. We find that at age 15, women and men are expected to be in an unpaid caregiving role for over half of their remaining life. For women in most of the countries, over half of those years will involve high-level caregiving for a family member. We also find that men lag in caregiving across most countries, even when using the lowest threshold of caregiving. As we show here, demographic techniques can be used to enhance our understanding of the gendered implications of population aging, particularly as they relate to policy research and public debate.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11113-021-09640-z.

Keywords: Caregiving; Gender; Life expectancy; Population aging; Sullivan method; Unpaid care work.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Age-specific caregiving proportions (any care and daily care) by country and gender—six select countries. Source ESS2
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Life expectancy at 15 by caregiving status (years). Note: AT Austria, BE Belgium, CH Switzerland, CZ Czech Republic, DE Germany, DK Denmark, EE Estonia, ES Spain, FI Finland, FR France, GB United Kingdom, GR Greece, HU Hungary, IE Ireland, LU Luxembourg, NL Netherlands, NO Norway, PL Poland, PT Portugal, SE Sweden, SI Slovenia, SK Slovakia, UA Ukraine. Source ESS2
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Total Care Life Expectancy at age 15 by level of caregiving (proportions). Note AT Austria, BE Belgium, CH Switzerland, CZ Czech Republic, DE Germany, DK Denmark, EE Estonia, ES Spain, FI Finland, FR France, GB United Kingdom, GR Greece, HU Hungary, IE Ireland, LU Luxembourg, NL Netherlands, NO Norway, PL Poland, PT Portugal, SE Sweden, SI Slovenia, SK Slovakia, UA Ukraine. High = daily or several times a week; Medium = about once a week or several times a month; Low = once a month or less. 100% = total Care Life Expectancy at age 15. Source ESS2
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Care Life Expectancy gender gap at age 15 by level of caregiving. Note Gender gap = Women’s CareLE—Men’s CareLE. High = daily or several times a week; Medium = about once a week or several times a month; Low = once a month or less. AT Austria, BE Belgium, CH Switzerland, CZ Czech Republic, DE Germany, DK Denmark, EE Estonia, ES Spain, FI Finland, FR France, GB United Kingdom, GR Greece, HU Hungary, IE Ireland, LU Luxembourg, NL Netherlands, NO Norway, PL Poland, PT Portugal, SE Sweden, SI Slovenia, SK Slovakia, UA Ukraine. Source ESS2

References

    1. Aburto JM, van Raalte A. Lifespan dispersion in times of life expectancy fluctuation: The case of central and eastern Europe. Demography. 2018;55(6):2071–2096. doi: 10.1007/s13524-018-0729-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Addati L. Care work and care jobs for the future of decent work. Geneva: International Labour Organization (ILO); 2018.
    1. Agree EM, Glaser K. International handbook of population aging. Dordrecht: Springer; 2009. Demography of informal caregiving; pp. 647–668.
    1. Albertini M, Kohli M, Vogel C. Intergenerational transfers of time and money in European families: common patterns—Different regimes? Journal of European Social Policy. 2007;17(4):319–334. doi: 10.1177/0958928707081068. - DOI
    1. Arpino B, Bordone V. Does grandparenting pay off? The effect of child care on grandparents' cognitive functioning. Journal of Marriage and Family. 2014;76(2):337–351. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12096. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources