Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 5:11:604194.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.604194. eCollection 2020.

Segregation and Life Satisfaction

Affiliations

Segregation and Life Satisfaction

Rodrigo Montero et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Our aim is to cast light on socioeconomic residential segregation effects on life satisfaction (LS). In order to test our hypothesis, we use survey data from Chile (Casen) for the years 2011 and 2013. We use the Duncan Index to measure segregation based on income at the municipality level for 324 municipalities. LS is obtained from the CASEN survey, which considers a question about self-reported well-being. Segregation's impact upon LS is not clear at first glance. On one hand, there is evidence telling that segregation's consequences are negative due to the spatial concentration of poverty and all the woes related to it. On the other hand, segregation would have positive effects because people may feel stress, unhappiness, and alienation when comparing themselves to better-off households. Additionally, there is previous evidence regarding the fact that people prefer to neighbor people of a similar socioeconomic background. Hence, an empirical test is needed. In order to implement it, we should deal with two problems, first, the survey limited statistical significance at the municipal level, hence we use the small area estimation (SAE) methodology to improve the estimations' statistic properties, and second, the double causality between segregation and LS; to deal with the latter, we include lagged LS as a regressor. Our findings indicate that socioeconomic segregation has a positive effect on LS. This result is robust to different econometric specifications.

Keywords: inequality; quality of life; segregation; small area estimations; social capital; subjective wellbeing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Life satisfaction and SAE, 2011.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Life satisfaction and SAE, 2013.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Life satisfaction and SAE for the proportion of people who are satisfied with their lives, 2013.

References

    1. Alesina A., La Ferrara E. (2000). Participation in heterogeneous communities. Q. J. Econ. 115 847–904. 10.1162/003355300554935 - DOI
    1. Argyle M. (2001). The Psychology of Happiness. London: Routledge.
    1. Bashir S. A. (2002). Home is where the harm is: inadequate housing as a public health crisis. Am. J. Public Health 92 733–738. 10.2105/AJPH.92.5.733 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bittencourt T. A., Giannotti M., Marques E. (2020). Cumulative (and self-reinforcing) spatial inequalities: interactions between accessibility and segregation in four Brazilian metropolises. Environ. Plan. B Urban Anal. City Sci. 10.1177/2399808320958426 - DOI
    1. Bovaird T., Elke L. (2003). Evaluating the quality of public governance: indicators, models and methodologies. Int. Rev. Admin. Sci. 69 313–328. 10.1177/0020852303693002 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources