Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 3:12:571072.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.571072. eCollection 2021.

Drought-Induced Root Pressure in Sorghum bicolor

Affiliations

Drought-Induced Root Pressure in Sorghum bicolor

Sarah Tepler Drobnitch et al. Front Plant Sci. .

Abstract

Root pressure, also manifested as profusive sap flowing from cut stems, is a phenomenon in some species that has perplexed biologists for much of the last century. It is associated with increased crop production under drought, but its function and regulation remain largely unknown. In this study, we investigated the initiation, mechanisms, and possible adaptive function of root pressure in six genotypes of Sorghum bicolor during a drought experiment in the greenhouse. We observed that root pressure was induced in plants exposed to drought followed by re-watering but possibly inhibited by 100% re-watering in some genotypes. We found that root pressure in drought stressed and re-watered plants was associated with greater ratio of fine: coarse root length and shoot biomass production, indicating a possible role of root allocation in creating root pressure and adaptive benefit of root pressure for shoot biomass production. Using RNA-Seq, we identified gene transcripts that were up- and down-regulated in plants with root pressure expression, focusing on genes for aquaporins, membrane transporters, and ATPases that could regulate inter- and intra-cellular transport of water and ions to generate positive xylem pressure in root tissue.

Keywords: RNA-Seq; agriculture; aquaporin; root pressure; transporter; water relations; xylem transport.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Boxplot of total shoot biomass achieved before harvest by each genotype grown either under control or deficit conditions, as well as percent deficit shoot biomass for each genotype.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Boxplot of root pressure (KPa) measured in control plants vs. deficit plants. Directly before measurements, sample plants were re-watered with 100% of their daily evapotranspiration loss, or not re-watered at all.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Root pressure (KPa) by genotype in samples re-watered before measurement with 50 or 100% of daily evapotranspiration loss. Error bars represent standard error.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Principal component analysis of re-watered plants in the Deficit treatment. Loading arrows indicate the magnitude and direction of trait variation (7 traits) underlying the sample distribution. Ellipses indicate groupings by genotype.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Relationship between root pressure (KPa) and the root system's relative allocation to fine roots (ratio of total fine root length to total coarse root length, unitless), by genotype. Orange genotypes (Btx642, IS3620C, and SC56) are drought susceptible, and green genotypes (RTx430, Btx623, and Tx700) are drought tolerant. Note that Btx623 and Tx700 (bottom panels) have much higher proportions of fine roots than the other genotypes. Dotted regression lines indicate non-significant relationships.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Normalized RNA-Seq counts of gene transcripts in each of three treatment groups (Control Low, Deficit Low, and Deficit Mid) for the following differentially-expressed genes: (A) PIP1;5, (B) NIP2;3, (C) WAT1-related protein Atg64700, (D) Salt stress-induced protein, (E) Beta-galactosidase 9, (F) Beta-amylase 3, (G) Plasmodesmata callose-binding protein.

References

    1. Alexandersson E., Fraysse L., Sjövall-Larsen S., Gustavsson S., Fellert M., Karlsson M., et al. . (2005). Whole gene family expression and drought stress regulation of aquaporins. Plant Mol. Biol. 59, 469–484. 10.1007/s11103-005-0352-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andrews S. (2010). FastQC: A Quality Control Tool for High Throughput Sequence Data. Available online at: http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/
    1. Barrios-Masias F. H., Knipfer T., McElrone A. J. (2015). Differential responses of grapevine rootstocks to water stress are associated with adjustments in fine root hydraulic physiology and suberization. J. Exp. Bot. 66, 6069–6078. 10.1093/jxb/erv324 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boyer J. S. (1982). Plant productivity and environment. Science 218, 443–448. 10.1126/science.218.4571.443 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Buchanan C. D., Lim S., Salzman R. A., Kagiampakis I., Morishige D. T., Weers B. D., et al. . (2005). Sorghum bicolor's transcriptome response to dehydration, high salinity and ABA. Plant Mol. Biol. 58, 699–720. 10.1007/s11103-005-7876-2 - DOI - PubMed