Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 4:9:630363.
doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.630363. eCollection 2021.

Sociodemographic Differences in Prenatal Diagnosis of Chromosomal Anomalies: A Population-Based Study

Affiliations

Sociodemographic Differences in Prenatal Diagnosis of Chromosomal Anomalies: A Population-Based Study

Michele Santoro et al. Front Pediatr. .

Abstract

Background: In Europe, about 76% of cases of chromosomal anomalies are prenatally diagnosed. Prenatal diagnosis allows more efficient planning of postnatal treatment and helps parents for an informed decision about the continuation of pregnancy. The main aim of this study was to evaluate whether the sociodemographic maternal characteristics affect the probability of prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal anomalies. Methods: Cases of chromosomal anomalies in the period 2005-2017 came from the population-based registry of congenital anomalies of Tuscany (Italy). Differences in the proportion of cases prenatally diagnosed were investigated through the following maternal characteristics: education, geographic origin and occupation. The association between cases of termination of pregnancy after prenatal diagnosis and maternal characteristics was also analysed. Odds Ratios (OR) adjusted by maternal age were calculated using logistic regression models. Results were provided for all cases of chromosomal anomalies and for Down syndrome cases. Results: A total of 1,419 cases were included in the study. Cases prenatally diagnosed were 1,186 (83.6%). We observed a higher proportion of cases not prenatally diagnosed among cases with low maternal education compared to those with high maternal education (OR = 2.16, p < 0.001) and in women from high migratory outflow countries, compared to the Italian ones (OR = 2.85, p < 0.001). For prenatally diagnosed Down syndrome cases, we observed a higher proportion of termination of pregnancy for women with low education level (OR = 4.36, p = 0.023). Conclusions: In our study evidence of differences in the probability of prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal anomalies associated with maternal education and geographic origin was found. Population-based studies investigating sociodemographic disparities can provide essential information for targeted public health programs. Further studies are recommended to monitor the impact of the increasing availability of non-invasive screening tests.

Keywords: chromosomal anomalies; down syndrome; maternal education; maternal geographic origin; maternal occupation; prenatal diagnosis; socioeconomic status.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. European Network of Population-Based Registries for the Epidemiological Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies (EUROCAT). Available online at: https://eu-rd-platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu/eurocat_en (accessed October 12, 2020).
    1. Khoshnood B, Wall S, Pryde P, Lee K. Maternal education modifies the age-related increase in the birth prevalence of Down syndrome. Prenat Diagn. (2004) 24:79–82. 10.1002/pd.749 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Khoshnood B, De Vigan C, Vodovar V, Goujard J, Goffinet F. A population-based evaluation of the impact of antenatal screening for Down's syndrome in France, 1981–2000. BJOG. (2004) 111:485–90. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00117.x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khoshnood B, De Vigan C, Vodovar V, Bréart G, Goffinet F, Blondel B. Advances in medical technology creation of disparities: the case of down syndrome. Am J Public Health. (2006) 96:2139–44. 10.2105/AJPH.2005.069377 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khoshnood B, De Vigan C, Blondel B, Vodovar V, Cadio E, Goffinet F. Long-term trends for socioeconomic differences in prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome: diffusion of services or persistence of disparities? BJOG. (2008) 115:1087–95. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01794.x - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources